Monthly Archives: August 2022

Armbands for phones: 16 Best Armbands for Phones in 2023

Опубликовано: August 11, 2022 в 4:36 pm

Автор:

Категории: Miscellaneous

The 9 Best Running Armbands For Your Phone In 2023

There are lots of reasons that you might choose to run with your phone, from tracking your miles or listening to music to contacting family in an emergency.

The only problem when running with a phone is working out how to carry it!

Nothing is more distracting than feeling your phone bounce against you with every stride. So you need to find a way to secure it whilst keeping it as accessible as possible.

One of the most popular options is to invest in a good running armband.

Not only should this keep your phone within easy reach, but it should hold it so snugly in place that you can forget you even have it with you!

There are lots of different armbands on the market designed for runners, each with a slightly different set of features. This means it can be tough to choose the one that will suit you best.

So we’ve made it easy by putting together this handy guide!

Read on to discover what to look for in a running phone armband, then check out our top 9 styles.

We’ve outlined all their main features, to help you pick the one you’ll find most comfortable for your next run.

Features to Look For in a Running Armband for Your Phone

The main priority when choosing a running phone armband is – of course – comfort!

And there are a few things that influence just how comfortable an armband is. It should be lightweight and breathable enough to prevent overheating, and made of a material that doesn’t chafe.

The fit should be snug without being overly tight and there should be no points at which your skin might be pinched.

This means you need to look for an armband that is adjustable, flexible, and soft against your skin.

Other things to consider include:

Stability and Security

These are connected to comfort, as an armband that holds your phone securely and stops it from bouncing will allow you to ignore it altogether!

Stability is also important when it comes to the safety of your phone.

You need to be sure that it is held firmly in the armband you choose and that there’s no risk of it falling out and hitting the ground.

Screen Access

This is very much a personal consideration and you need to think about how you use your phone when you run.

If you like the security of having it with you but don’t need to access the screen, then a simple armband into which you tuck your phone would be ideal.

But if you want to check your texts, access your playlist, or view your tracking data, then it’s important to choose a model that allows you to easily see and use your screen on the go.

Device Size

Not all armbands fit all phones, so make sure the one you choose is big enough to accommodate your device. Check, too, that it can hold it with or without a cover.

Also, consider if you’ll need an armband that can accommodate a variety of sizes.

This will give you more bang for your buck, as you won’t need to buy a new armband every time you change your phone.

Extra Features

Some armbands provide little more than a pocket for your phone, whereas others have places for extra items like gels, cards, a key, etc.

Whilst the extra space is handy, it usually results in a bulkier armband, so only choose one with additional pockets if you really need them.

Another useful feature to look for is a clip to take up the slack from your headphone cords and prevent them from flying around.

The 10 Best Running Phone Armbands

#1. TRIBE Water Resistant Cell Phone Running Holder

– Compatible with a wide range of phones, highly adjustable, and with a touch-sensitive screen cover

– An affordable option for on-the-go access

Providing easy access to your phone at all times, this holder features a highly sensitive touchscreen cover that protects your screen from showers.

It also has everything you need in terms of comfort, made from a breathable Lycra/neoprene blend that feels soft and wicks away moisture.

The dual buckle loops and adjustable elastic band ensure a perfect fit, so your phone sits snugly against your arm with no jiggling.

There are some nice little extras, too, including a built-in pocket for your key, a thick reflective strip for running in low-light conditions, and a cord organizer for your headphones.

Shop TRIBE Cell Phone Running Holder On Amazon

Shop TRIBE Cell Phone Running Holder On Walmart

#2. Sprigs Phone Armband Sleeve

– Fits any phone (even with a case), slide-on design, and Velcro closure

– Perfect for summer runs

If you’re looking for something simple, lightweight, and breathable, consider this popular running armband from Sprigs.

It comes in loads of cool colors and four different sizes, based on the size of your bicep.

It fits snugly enough to keep your phone perfectly still as you run and there are grip dots on the inside that effectively stop it from sliding down.

There’s no extra space for other items and you can’t access your phone without removing the band.

But as a discreet way to keep your phone with you for a distraction-free run, it’s one of the best styles out there!

Shop Sprigs Phone Armband Sleeve On Amazon

Shop Sprigs Phone Armband Sleeve On Fleet Feet

#3. Nike Pocket Arm Band Plus

– Compatible with most phones, adjustable arm strap, and with a low profile look and feel

– Great security for your device

Another simple running phone armband is this offering from Nike, featuring a reflective swoosh logo.

Unlike most other running armbands, it has a zippered closure. This is very secure and means you won’t have to worry about your phone falling out mid-run!

The clear window, meanwhile, protects it from the elements whilst giving you full touchscreen access.

The only caveat with this style is that it seems to be designed for a larger bicep. If you have a very slim build you might find the fit too loose, even when fully tightened.

Shop Nike Pocket Arm Band Plus On Amazon

Shop Nike Pocket Arm Band Plus On Nike

#4. E Tronic Edge Running Phone Holder

– Lightweight sleeve-style band, made with a quick-drying nylon-spandex fabric

– Fits all phones, even smaller models

This running armband from E Tronic is similar to the Sprigs band, but it has a bit more room for extra items like your keys and gels.

Ideal for running in a T-shirt (but difficult to wear over long sleeves), it is completely comfortable, with no pressure points to annoy you as you train.

The phone pocket is zippered for security. The zipper is also meant to make it easy to remove your phone on the go, although we found that tricky and preferred to remove the entire band instead.

Be sure to pick the right size, as a snug grip is key to stopping the armband from sliding as you train.

Shop E Tronic Edge Running Phone Holder On Amazon

#5. NEWPPON 360° Rotatable Running Phone Armband

– Direct screen access, Airpods holder, and a built-in hidden pocket

– A versatile mounted option

We love the stretchy silicone mount on this armband, which will accommodate everything from the smallest phone to the largest!

This makes the band a great choice if you’re likely to be switching phones any time soon!

The screen is fully exposed, which is great if you want completely unobstructed access. Just remember this means that it’s open to the elements, too.

The 360-degree rotation makes it easy to access data from all angles and the flexible strap fits arms up to 16 inches.

We prefer this option when running with long sleeves or a jacket.

That’s because the hard plastic from the mount tends to press into bare skin and can become uncomfortable.

Shop NEWPPON Rotatable Running Phone Armband On Amazon

#6. LifeProof LifeActive Armband With Quickmount

– Compatible with other Lifeproof products, lightweight, and with a locking switch for added security

– Most comfortable mounted running armband

Unlike the NEWPPON model, the Lifeproof armband requires you to attach an adapter to the back of your phone case.

This might be a deal-breaker for some, although you can get around the issue by buying a second phone case just for this purpose.

And we think it’s worth it, as the mounting process is so easy!

You simply attach your phone with a single click, then remove it with a twist.

We found it comfortable even in a short-sleeved T-shirt or vest. This is because the mounting piece uses only a very small amount of plastic that you can’t feel against your skin.

Shop LifeProof LifeActive Armband With Quickmount On Amazon

#7. Proviz Y-Fumble Reflective Unisex Phone Arm Pocket

– 4-way stretch material, sleeve style, and machine washable

– Best running phone armband for low-light conditions

From a company famous for its high-quality reflective gear, this arm pocket will help ensure that you can clearly be seen when running at night.

Seamless and lightweight, it is comfortable to wear, with plenty of space for extras like your cards or keys.

The flexible fabric feels soft and is available in three different sizes, ensuring a snug grip that prevents movement.

We recommend sizing up, though, as these bands definitely run on the small side.

Shop Proviz Y-Fumble Reflective Unisex Phone Arm Pocket On amazon

– Clear window for full touchscreen access, a reflective strip, and lots of space for extra items

– Best running armband for heavy-duty use

If you regularly run long distances over rough and rugged terrain, this is the armband for you.

Drop test certified, it is designed to be weatherproof, sweatproof, and mudproof.

It is also versatile and you can wear it on your forearm or hand if you prefer. You can even attach it to your bike!

This makes it a great all-rounder, suitable for a range of activities.

Offering more storage space than most, the Mega i-40 can easily accommodate your key, cards, and gels.

But this has a downside, and – whilst comfortable -this armband was the bulkiest model we tried.

Shop Armpocket Mega i-40 Arm Band On Amazon

Shop Armpocket Mega i-40 Arm Band On Fleet Feet

https://www.amazon.com/Armpocket-Sweat-Weather-Armband-Medium/dp/B00CK93HM2
https://www.fleetfeet.com/products/armpocket-mega-i-40

– Reinforced stitching for durability, soft fabric, and a dual adjustable arm strap

– Most affordable running armband for iPhones

Considering it’s just a fraction of the price of other running phone armbands, this model has some pretty cool features!

Designed specifically for iPhones, it gives access to all ports and makes it easy to connect headphones. There’s a clip to keep the cords organized, too.

You can view and manipulate the screen via the touch-sensitive window, and there are built-in pockets for your key and cards.

We also like the fact that this product has been recently redesigned in order to accommodate your phone AND its case. This saves you the hassle of removing it for every run!

Shop LOVPHONE Armband for iPhone On Amazon

The Best Running Armband for Your Phone: Key Takeaways

Choosing the right running armband allows you to focus on your training whilst having easy access to your phone when you need it.

We hope this guide has been helpful in choosing a style that will suit your needs and help enhance your running experience.

The Best Running Jackets for Heavy Rain

Many running jackets on the market are described as ‘waterproof’, but it’s only when the heavens really open that you discover they’re not quite cut out for the job!

If you’re looking for a jacket to keep you dry and comfortable through even the most severe downpours, check out our guide to the 7 Best Running Jackets for Heavy Rain.

0
shares

  • Share

  • Tweet

The 4 Best Running Armbands

Best Overall Phone Armband

LifeProof LifeActiv Armband Quickmount

$17 at Amazon

Style: Mount | Extras: None

REASONS TO BUY

Phone detaches from armband

No case to interfere with touchscreen

Magnetic guide for easy, one-handed attachment

REASONS TO AVOID

Lacks weather protection

No padding on velcro strap

Expensive

The LifeProof LifeActiv Armband Quickmount sets itself apart from the rest as the most versatile and functional armband we tested. Removing the phone is quick and easy, so reviewing a map or changing the playlist can be done without interrupting your run. Some armbands come with a rotating mount, but those still require neck-craning and arm-twisting maneuvers to use your phone. The LifeActiv allows you to detach the phone one-handed just by flipping a lever and giving the phone a twist, and magnets guide the phone into place for quick and easy reattachment. It only took a few quick tries to get the hang of detaching and re-attaching, all while keeping our focus on the road ahead.

One shortcoming some may consider to be a dealbreaker is that this model requires a mounting piece to be permanently attached to the back of your phone using a strong glue. It’s not difficult to do, and the mount is slim, but it ultimately adds some volume to your phone. Still, we didn’t mind dealing with the extra bulk in exchange for long blissful runs with little time lost to fidgeting with an armband. Another important thing to note is that this armband doesn’t offer any protection from the elements since it doesn’t encase your phone in any kind of sleeve. However, if you’re a serious runner who needs GPS navigation and likes to switch up your playlist often, we think you will enjoy the LifeActiv model.

The Lifeactive is a tester favorite. It allows for an easy “quick draw” removal of the phone from your arm, and you can re-attach your phone with one hand!

Credit: Matt Bento

Best Bang For the Buck

LOVPHONE Armband

$9 at Amazon

Style: Sleeve | Extras: Key/cardholder, headphone clip

REASONS TO BUY

Snug and stable fit

Provides a little weather protection

Inexpensive

REASONS TO AVOID

Phone can’t be accessed without removing the armband

Difficult to text or navigate apps while the phone is in place

The LOVPHONE Armband is a super affordable armband offering solid performance. This model gives you a convenient way to carry your phone along to track your fitness, and we recommend it for those who don’t intend to utilize apps or switch up playlists during their run. This armband doesn’t move once it is strapped into place, meaning it won’t chafe, allowing you to focus on your run. A small pouch behind the main phone pocket gives you another safe place to stash tiny essentials like a key or credit card, and there is a little velcro tab to keep your headphone cord from flying all over the place.

Although this armband keeps your phone safe and secure, it isn’t easy to use apps or make adjustments to your music on the fly. The clear plastic cover allows for tapping, pinching, and swiping, but you’d have to contort yourself to actually see what’s on the screen, and you’ll definitely need to stop running to use your phone. If you’re the type of runner who likes to “set it and forget it” while focusing on putting miles under your feet, this is the armband for you.

Affordably priced, comfortable, and complete with features like a credit card holder and a headphone clip, we are big fans of the PHONELOV.

Credit: Matt Bento

Most Comfortable

Tune Belt Sport

$20 at Amazon

Style: Sleeve | Extras: Headphone clip

REASONS TO BUY

Padded strap

Easily adjusted

Multiple access points for headphone cords

REASONS TO AVOID

Too thin for phones in bulky cases

Initially, we were skeptical about the thin padded strap on the Tune Belt Sport, but we were pleasantly surprised a few miles in to realize it stayed in place well and was actually quite comfortable. Its comfort is owed to the mostly neoprene construction. The thin velcro strap is easily adjustable while on the move, allowing you to promptly change the band’s position to get a better view of the screen. The neoprene sleeve and clear plastic screen cover also add a bit of weather protection.

It’s not too challenging to remove the phone from the band, but only our most determined and dexterous testers could place the phone back in the sleeve without removing the band from their arm. The plastic screen cover allows for touchscreen operation but slightly impacts the touch response of the screen. All in all, the Tune Belt Sport occupies a happy medium between a floating mount style armband and a more protective sleeve, while offering comfort for the long haul.

The Tune Belt can accommodate a wide range of sizes. We found that when using a smaller phone, the tune belt still held the phone snug and secure, and we didn’t experience any annoying jostling when running with it.

Credit: Matt Bento

Best One Size Fits All

Newppon 180 Rotatable

$13 at Amazon

Style: Mount | Extras: Headphone clip, keyholder

REASONS TO BUY

180 degrees of rotation

Stretchy silicone mount holds phones of all sizes

Elastic strap accommodates arms 8″-16″

REASONS TO AVOID

Plastic parts can feel uncomfortable

Very small key holder

“One size fits all” is a bold claim, but the Newppon 180 Rotatable delivers with a grippy silicone mount that stretches to accommodate devices as large as an iPad mini securely. We even tested it with an old iPhone 5, and it remained in place as we sprinted our way through our tests. There is no sleeve to interfere with the screen, and the rotation function makes it much easier to see the screen and use your phone while it’s still attached to your arm.

This armband employs a solid plastic component to keep the phone firmly in place, and there is very little material to pad the plastic. If the band isn’t situated high enough on your bicep, it can feel uncomfortable. When worn over a shirt sleeve in colder weather, this was less of an issue. We also found that the advertised keyholder is a bit small to hold most keys securely. If you’re always upgrading to the newest device, this armband is a good choice since it can handle many different models and case sizes.

The Newppon is pretty nifty, with stretch silicon straps that hold a range of phone sizes, plus it rotates 180 degrees, making it a little easier to see what’s on your screen.

Credit: Matt Bento

Best Low Profile Armband

Tribe Fitness Water Resistant

$12 at Amazon

Style: Sleeve | Extras: Keyholder, headphone clip

REASONS TO BUY

Water-resistant neoprene

Durable

REASONS TO AVOID

Won’t fit bulky cases

Not very padded

Do you loathe the feeling of your phone shaking and wiggling against your arm as you run? Are you looking for an armband that will hold your phone as snugly against your arm as possible? The low-profile Tribe Fitness Water Resistant is a solution for folks who just want a simple, effective way to run with their phone without having it flop around annoyingly in their pocket. Additionally, the Tribe provides a key holder pocket and a headphone clip without adding any extra bulk.

If your phone is in a bulky protective case, you may need to remove the case to fit your phone in the slim neoprene sleeve. The armband has a snug fit, so removing the phone from the sleeve while the band is still on your arm feels nearly impossible. Although the neoprene backing feels soft against the skin, our testers occasionally felt the vinyl front piece poke them in the arm. For those who don’t want to fuss with their phone while hammering out the miles, the Tribe Armband will do the trick.

This armband holds your very snug against your arm, but the thin neoprene sleeve may not fit your phone if it has a bulky case.

Credit: Matt Bento

Best Inexpensive Armband with Removable Mount

Tribe Fitness Running Phone Holder

See It

Style: Mount | Extras:: Keyholder, headphone clip

REASONS TO BUY

One-size-fits-all design

360-degree rotating mount

REASONS TO AVOID

Larger devices wiggle around

Mount is tricky to remove

On this armband, Tribe utilizes a removable and rotatable mount to alleviate the challenges associated with in-stride phone access and usage. The Tribe Fitness Running Phone Holder has the ultimate feature set to provide incredible accessibility, so you can use your phone with minimal interruption to your activity.

In reality, this mounting system is not as smooth or user-friendly as the

LifeActiv armband. The entire mount slides out to disconnect from the armband, but it requires some effort, and it’s easy to accidentally pull the phone out of the silicone bands if you don’t grab it just right. Additionally, the mount holds the phone farther away from your arm than other systems. This causes the phone to jiggle around more. Fortunately, this band can fit various device sizes with no need to permanently attach a mounting piece to your device. If you’re looking for a decent and more affordable alternative to the LifeActiv armband, this band is a good option.

This armband uses stretchy silicone to hold your device in place. It can secure smaller phones like the one shown here but stretches to accommodate devices a large as an iPad mini. Our testers agreed that they’d rather not go running with an iPad strapped to their arm.

Credit: Matt Bento

Best Zippered Sleeve

E-Tronic Edge Armband Sleeve

$8 at Amazon

Style: Sleeve | Extras: Zippered closure

REASONS TO BUY

No velcro band

Comfortable

REASONS TO AVOID

Phone cannot be accessed without stopping activity

Hard to put on over a long-sleeved shirt

The E-tronic Edge Armband Sleeve is unique among its contenders. It consists of a one-piece lycra sleeve with a zippered pouch. This design has many advantages, such as comfortable straps, no pressure points, a key or card pocket, and a zippered pouch that can fit most phone sizes. If you nail the sizing, the whole sleeve stays put nicely at the base of your elbow.

The zippered pouch keeps your device secure, but it isn’t easy to unzip while it’s on your arm. More often than not, pulling the zipper tab just ends up pulling the sleeve up or down your arm without opening the pouch. This armband can also be difficult to put on over a long-sleeved shirt or a jacket. Forget about accessing your phone or messing with your apps while wearing this armband, but if you’re a smartwatch owner who pairs their device with some wireless headphones, this unique sleeve may be the most comfortable choice.

There is a phone in there! While comfortable, this armband is not for folks who like to frequently change their playlists or look at a GPS during their runs.

Credit: Matt Bento

Why You Should Trust Us

This review comes to you from lifelong runners Matt Bento and Hannah Hall. Both are seasoned gear testers who are very critical of their equipment. From backcountry slogs to urban marathons, these two have enough miles under their feet to know how much a comfortable armband can enhance a run. Matt likes to curate long playlists to stay focused as the miles go by, while Hannah likes to adjust the music on her phone mid-run, blasting the right tunes to charge the next hill, or check her GPS app to monitor her progress. Their diverse preferences and needs provide for a complete and comprehensive assessment of the top cell phone armbands.

We did the majority of the testing by strapping these armbands on and hitting the local trails and neighborhood streets. We also wore the armbands while performing various exercises like pushups, pullups, and burpees. We paid special attention to how comfortable each model felt on our arms, how easy it is to view our phone’s screen and use apps while the armband is strapped on, and how much movement or wiggle we felt while we ran. We conducted our tests with three different phones of varying sizes.

Analysis and Test Results

We identified four key metrics to evaluate armbands. Comfort was first and foremost. Although comfort can be somewhat subjective, the Tune Belt Sport is an easy favorite. Ease of use also greatly affected our choice of armbands, with the LifeActiv coming up on top due to how easy it is to attach and remove our phones while the band is strapped to our arms. We took versatility into account, specifically asking, “can this armband fit a variety of phone sizes?” Finally, we looked at stability, paying close attention to the movement of our devices and whether or not the armbands shifted on our arms.

Why do you need an armband?

Although you can keep your phone in a pocket, fanny pack, or backpack, an armband will give you the most access to your device with the least interference to your workout. Most athletic wear has small pockets (or none at all), and the feeling of a phone jostling around while you move can be distracting or downright uncomfortable. Anyone running longer distances with a small backpack will need to stop their activity and remove the pack to operate their phones. If your earbuds aren’t wireless, you’ll need to run the cord down your shirt or out of half-opened zippers to connect to your device. Many armbands also include a clip or velcro tab to manage the slack in your headphone cord. All these small conveniences add up to a lot of what will improve your running or workout experience.

Larger armbands can interfere with certain exercises and stretching positions. We found that armbands with softer materials mitigated this problem.

Credit: Matt Bento

Comfort

A comfortable armband can encourage you to rack up the miles while listening to your favorite songs. An uncomfortable armband, in contrast, will have you turning around and heading home in disappointment. The most comfortable armbands we tested feature some type of moisture-wicking padding, highly adjustable straps, and soft, flexible components. The least comfortable models had rigid plastic parts that uncomfortably dug into our arms when we bent or stretched, or unpadded straps that pinched or chafed during a long run.

We found the Tune Belt Sport Armband extremely comfortable despite having a thin velcro strap.

Credit: Matt Bento

The Tune Belt Sport is a favorite in terms of comfort because it is heavily padded with neoprene and provides good adjustability with its velcro strap. The strap is thin and easy to adjust on the fly and wide enough to avoid pressure points. The E-tronic Edge is also a comfy model, distributing pressure evenly over a soft, stretchy sleeve and forgoing any velcro straps. Because the E-tronic Edge isn’t adjustable, it’s important to pay attention to the manufacturer’s sizing guidelines. Among the removable mount-style armbands, the LifeActiv Armband is the most comfortable, with only a small bit of plastic included for the mounting piece that never interfered with our movements.

The unique E-Tronic running sleeve keeps your device in a zippered pouch. Our testers found this design quite comfortable, but had trouble accessing their phones, since when they tugged on the zipper, it pulled the whole sleeve down instead of unzipping.

Credit: Matt Bento

The less comfortable models were the mount-style with larger plastic components like the Newppon 180 Rotatable and the Tribe Fitness Running Phone Holder. While neither were particularly bothersome while running, we noticed the rigid plastic poking our arms during specific exercises and stretching positions.

The models that use stretchy silicone to hold the phone in place kept our phones secure but removing and reattaching the phone while the armband is still strapped to our arms proved incredibly difficult.

Credit: Matt Bento

Ease of Use

Some runners like to “set it and forget it,” strapping their armband on and enjoying their infinite playlist as the miles fly by. Most of us, however, will need to occasionally access our phones to change up the tunes, check our splits, or glance at a GPS app. Although we’d like to ignore our phones while running, constant connectivity is a necessity for some, so being able to quickly access your phone to receive a call is an important function. When assessing ease of use, we looked at how quickly we could strap on and remove the armbands, how difficult it was to see our screens and perform basic functions like texting and choosing songs, as well as whether or not we could remove our phones without removing the entire armbands.

Of the armbands we tested, sleeve-style models with clear plastic front pieces offered the most protection from the elements. The floating mount style armbands grip the back of the phone and expose it completely, making it easier to use your phone on the go but leaving the phone vulnerable in a drizzle. None of the models we tested are completely waterproof, so if you go running rain or shine, you’ll want to pair them with a waterproof case, and you’ll need to make sure you find an armband that can fit your phone with the case on. The Tune Belt is particularly accommodating to bulky phone cases, while the Tribe Fitness Water Resistant Armband offers the most weather protection, but it can be a tight squeeze for a phone in a waterproof case.

Magnetic guides help you dock the phone with the Lifeactive armband, and a small switch locks it in place. The whole process takes about 5 seconds.

Credit: Matt Bento

The LifeActiv Armband easily takes the cake when it comes to convenience. After installing a thin plastic mounting piece to the back of your phone or phone case, you can easily attach it to the band on your arm, and remove it again by clicking the lock switch and twisting the phone. Then you can quickly check Strava, switch to your favorite metal playlist, slap your phone back in place, and run off into the sunset.

To use the Lifeactiv armband, you need to permanently fix a mounting piece on the back of your phone or phone case. It holds the phone very securely, but you can’t remove the mounting piece if you want to switch to another device.

Credit: Matt Bento

Armbands with rotating mounts like the Tribe Running Armband and the Newppon allow you to change the viewing angle to make reading and typing a little easier while the phone is on your arm. This means you don’t have to bend or crane your neck as much to use your phone as you do with a fixed armband.

The Newppon armband lets you rotate your phone 180 degrees on a floating mount, so you can better position your phone to see the screen or send a text. It s easy to rotate, but there is enough resistance that doesn’t rotate when you don’t want it to.

Credit: Matt Bento

Armbands with clear plastic screen shields like the Lovphone Armband and the Tune Belt Sport offer some protection for your phone while letting you see and manipulate the screen. However, they can’t provide the same accuracy or sensitivity as an unprotected screen. The E-tronic Edge holds your phone in a zippered pouch. You’ll need to completely remove your phone from the pouch to use it.

Sleeve-style armbands are less convenient when it comes to accessing your phone. A clear plastic window in the front allows you to tap and scroll on the screen, but you won’t be able to use buttons on the top or sides of the phone.

Credit: Matt Bento

Almost all the models we tested employed some form of velcro strap to cinch the armband down and secure it to your arm. The Tune Belt is the quickest and easiest to adjust, and most others are close behind. The advantage of the velcro strap design is that you can adjust the tightness of the band and easily put it on over a jacket or long sleeve shirt. The E-tronic Edge employs a strapless sleeve design that you slide on over your arm. It’s comfortable but very frustrating to put on over a shirt sleeve.

Versatility

A versatile armband would ideally fit a variety of devices and help you avoid buying a new armband whenever you have to get a new phone. The Newppon 180 Rotatable and the Tribe Phone Holder both have stretchy silicone bands that secure phones in place surprisingly well and accommodate devices as small as an iPhone 5 all the way up to an iPad mini.

These one-size-fits-all bands use stretchy silicone straps to secure the phone in place. They can hold a phone as small as an iPhone 5 snugly but can expand to accommodate and Galaxy 8 and even an iPad mini.

Credit: Matt Bento

Assuming that new phones will continue to keep getting bigger, the sleeve-style armbands are not as accommodating. In our testing, putting a small phone in a sleeve that is too big for it didn’t detract from our experience at all. After you cinch down the velcro, even a small phone won’t move around. The E-tronic Edge has a pretty stretchy pouch that could hold a small phone, keys, and even a couple of energy gel packets.

Several armbands feature a small pocket to hold a house key.

Credit: Matt Bento

Extra features also enhance a model’s versatility. The Lovphone Armband, both Tribe armbands, and the Newppon include a key holder. With the exceptions of the LifeActiv and the E-tronic Edge, every armband had a small velcro clip to remove slack from your headphone cords and prevent them from flying all over the place.

A one size fits all mount-style armband like this one will allow you to use the same band if you get new phone of a different size. This design tends to wiggle around more than the sleeve-style bands, so if you plan to wear an armband while doing dynamic exercises, a sleeve-style is a better choice.

Credit: Matt Bento

Stability

Closely linked to comfort, stability refers to how much a device moves around or jiggles in the armband as you move. Some users may not find this to be an issue, but many of our testers found too much movement to be infuriating. If your phone feels like it’s bouncing all over the place while secured in an armband, you might as well just keep it in your pocket. Although some models permitted more movement than others, none of the armbands had us worried that our phones would fall out.

With “sleeve style” armbands, your phone is held very securely within a sleeve. These are the most stable and comfortable types of armbands, but once you put them one, it will be difficult to access your phone.

Credit: Matt Bento

The sleeve-style armbands are certainly the most stable, holding our phones snugly in place, especially after cranking down on the velcro straps. These include the Tune Belt Sport, the Lovphone, the Tribe Water Resistant Armband, and the E-tronic Edge.

Less stable are the floating mount-style armbands. The wiggle factor here seems to depend on how far away the mount holds the phone and can be compounded by the size of your device. The LifeActiv is the most stable. It keeps the phone mount close to the armband and includes a locking mechanism. On the Tribe Running Phone Holder, the mount sits farther away, and we found that this caused the phone to move quite a bit while we ran.

The Tribe armband on the left holds the phone farther away from your arm than the Newppon armband on the right, resulting in a less stable, “jiggly” running experience.

Credit: Matt Bento

Conclusion

We hope you find that this deep dive into cell phone armbands helps you find the best product to get you off and running. Remember, the whole point of these armbands is to provide more comfort and convenience than running with a phone in your pocket. Pay special attention to the size of your phone and the size of your arms when ordering an armband, and consider how much you like to tinker with your phone while you run. Additionally, you might consider a pair of top-rated running headphones to keep the music going with little hassle.

The right armband will keep your phone secure and accessible, so you can stay connected and inspired, mile after mile.

Credit: Matt Bento

Best phone armbands for carrying your phone while running

Armbands are essential if you want to take your phone with you while running. Carrying a phone in your hand is annoying, as is putting it in your pocket where it will slap your thigh every step of the way, but if you just want to carry your phone, cards, and keys around, use a phone band. . Here we will discuss the best armbands to carry your phone for running and workouts.

What will we see here?

  • 1. Tribal Running Headband
  • 2. E Tronic Edge Phone Headbands!
  • 3. TuneBelt
  • 4. Quad lock headband.
  • 5. Armpocket armbands!
  • 6. Gritin running belt!
  • 7. Hays bandage.
  • Conclusion
  • Read more!

1.

Tribal Running Headband

This inexpensive lycra headband is wildcard in listing . It’s our top pick for the price due to its great features packed into a modest little armband. Firstly, Lycra is comfortable on the skin, light , and now it’s not too tight. The large elastic cape with a fastener is well ventilated and you won’t warm your hand. Contact Display Protection waterproof and protects your smartphone from sweat and splashes while keeping accessible touch screen .

Some of the other features we love include a cash/card pocket behind a smartphone slot, a headphone cable holder to keep tangles out of the way, and wide reflective strip which goes through the smartphone window. It also fits almost any smartphone, although you can take yours out of the case if you need to apply this bandage. Considering the features and the price, it is very worthy of our best offer. Another issue that you should choose Tribe for is its advanced and pleasing quality, ensuring you that your smartphone is in good hands.

Buy for $16.98 * US/MX/CA

2.

E Tronic Edge Phone Armbands !

In addition to being extremely light The E Tronic Edge Smartphone Wrist Case is also great for use with smartphones of various sizes and hand sizes. If you haven’t been Bluetooth trained yet, you’ll appreciate that this headband has headphone holes so you can listen to songs while you run. In addition to functionality, this product is aimed at comfort. This premium material is made from a blend of nylon and spandex. It comes in 4 different sizes, each providing a comfortable suit that will keep your smartphone safe while you work out.

Buy for $12.97 * US / MX / CA

Buy for £12.97 * UK / EU

3. TuneBelt

Although some armbands claim to fit for huge mobile phones, usually not enough for placing a smartphone in a case. But this matching phone from Tune Belt has enough room for both, even the most important phone and copies along with Otterbox or Lifeproof. Very strong smooth and soft , this gives the stable grip of , so it stays in place without feeling too tight.

This is made from absorbent neoprene material and has no holes directly on the skin so your tool stays protected from sweat and weather. A clear plastic window covers the display but allows the full touch display of the . This armband also functions as a handy wire wrap flap to keep you out of the way and out of the way of extra cord.

Buy for $19.91 * US / MX / CA

Buy for £29.00 * UK / EU

4 . Quad Lock Headband

For people who need some extra stability of and something even more suitable to replace your smartphone, this locking headband will be the right choice for you. A true armband is flexible and highly adjustable so it should fit all arms. To connect your smartphone to the headband, you need to put on the comfortable and well-fitted smartphone case that you will receive with your purchase.

It’s as easy as putting 2 locks together and twisting them together. Do the same to exclude the smartphone from the bracelet. The beauty of this setup is that you can use it anywhere! Attach the strap to your bike handlebars to use your smartphone while cycling, or to the treadmill as a phone holder.

The observations and advice in this article we prepared based on the experience of the team, the width of the strap helped to release the pressure of the strap, even when it was pulled up, and the Velcro never slipped. The smartphone felt stable in its mount and the lack of a case suggested it could be fully used. It’s worth noting that if you’re going out in all weather, you might want something with more water resistance, but Quad Lock compatibility makes it great. is a great choice for people who need a multi-sport choice.

Buy for $41.00 * US / MX / CA

Buy for £74.00 * UK / EU

5.

Armpocket Phone Armbands !

This is the armband for those who need to keep it all. At , the ‘s generous, unobstructed entry in the window compartment lovingly stores your mobile phone and case, while the back pocket stores a crushed block sleeve and a few other things you need for a long run. 9The 0005 is stretchy, smooth to adjust for the , and stays secure in the area thanks to the simple layout we wanted to replicate with the Amphipod Luxe.

A layer of mesh behind the smartphone compartment allows some sweat ventilation . The simplest potential downside to this otherwise comfortable smartphone vendor is that it feels a little overwhelmed when you’re carrying the best smartphone without a case, compared to slicker cases like the Armpocket Racer Plus and inCase Active Armband.

Buy for $44.95 * US/MX/CA

Buy for £30.96 * UK/EU

6.

Greetin Run Group!

This Grittin cell phone armband is made of neoprene rubber which is clearly useful in keeping water out of the bandage.

Just as good as walking, we also wet this Running Headband to see how quickly you can expect it to dry out if you get stuck in a downpour for a run. It comes with slot on your key – useful if you use a locker at the gym and it has reflective strip too just if you need to run at night. Best for home workouts or outdoor running.

Buy for $5.98 * US / MX / CA

Buy for £6.99 * UK / EU

7. Hays bandage.

Haissky is a lightweight yet very comfortable running harness. Probably a satisfactory element of this armband is zipper slot desig n, which helps you keep your AirPods and car key. The combination of Lycra and TPU fabric makes it quite soft and stretchy, which gives your pores and skin the freedom to breathe you want. In addition, HAISSKY also has sweatproof which also completes its profile as a practical sports bandage. TPU display screen protector provides vital protection for touch screen against scratches. In addition, a clean window also allows you to apply your tool without problems.

Buy for $9.34* US/MX/CA

Buy for £21.25* UK/EU

all of the above and further highlighting it, Tribe sells the best armbands on your smartphone. There are many reasons why we choose Tribe as the best. One of them has to do with the outstanding affordable range it offers. Right? Another factor why you should choose TRIBE is its advanced and fine quality which ensures that your smartphone is in good hands. There are also several additional features, including a non-slip design made from the hardest and highest quality materials, water resistance and many additional features.

Logitech steering wheels pc: Logitech G29 Driving Force Steering Wheels & Pedals

Опубликовано: August 10, 2022 в 4:36 pm

Автор:

Категории: Miscellaneous

Logitech G923 racing wheel review

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

(Image: © Future)

Our Verdict

From the brake pedal to the force feedback motors, the Logitech G923 racing wheel delivers at a grade that is hard to match at this price tag. Through and through, it delivers an experience that is at least comparable with pricier, more modular sets.

For
  • Everything you need in one package
  • Force feedback with oomph
  • Comfy grip
  • Quality pedal set
Against
  • Too few TrueForce supported games
  • Plastic mounting system
  • Belt- and direct-drive designs offer better feedback
  • G29 and G920 are cheaper and very similar

PC Gamer’s got your back
Our experienced team dedicates many hours to every review, to really get to the heart of what matters most to you. Find out more about how we evaluate games and hardware.

You can spend as much money as you like on a racing sim setup for your gaming PC. I’m not just talking about extravagant prices for the latest graphics cards or CPUs. It’s the monitors, the shifters, the pedals. Perhaps you want a full racing seat rig, or want to go fully-modular with the wheel base and steering wheel. Top-notch rigs trade affordability for realism, immersion, and feedback on the track. 

But while there’s a big difference between McLaren’s top-secret F1 simulator and the $400 Logitech G923, you’d be surprised how much realism there is on offer from something cheap and cheerful in the sim racing world.

The Logitech G923 is a wheel I’ve been keen to try out for some time due to its popularity. It follows in the footsteps of the Logitech G29/G920, a popular racing wheel for PC/Xbox/PS4, and very little has changed between them. In fact, they’re near-enough identical. 

It’s no surprise, then, if you’re an owner of Logitech’s previous racing wheel, the G29 or G920, you’ll not find a suitable upgrade path in the G923. I’d recommend checking out the Fanatec CSL Elite or its upcoming CSL DD wheelbase. You could even go whole hog and step up to a more pricey direct drive option.

Similarly, if you’re in the market for a cheaper racing wheel, the G29/G920 make for a great, PC-friendly options that have come down in price significantly since the launch of the G923.

Importantly in this case, though, the Logitech G923 can be considered affordable. For that, it sticks to its roots with a twin motor force feedback construction. It’s not quite a direct drive or even belt-driven wheel base, but it’s got kick where you want it around the corners or over bumpy terrain. You’ll know when a tyre is clipping the outer edge of the curb, or when your left rear clips the grass—it’s that level of fine-grain feedback you’ll need to nail lap times at the ragged edge of sim-racing.

Logitech G923 specs

Wheel: Anodized aluminium/leather wheel with steel steering shaft and rear shifters
Base: 
Dual-motor geared force feedback
Pedals: 
Tri-pedal unit with carpet grip system
Movement: 900-degree
Price: $400 (£350)

The G923 certainly hits that sweet spot of enough. .. what’s the best word… womp? It throws the wheel around some, is what I mean. There’s also enough resistance there to mimic the racing experience and keep you close to the track. in a way that you simply can’t experience without decent force feedback. It’s not going to throw you around corners quite like some more expensive kits, but at the same time the G923 isn’t scared of dragging your wheel off course as you’re careening out of a corner.

(Image credit: Future)

The benefit of this wheel over some others is that, despite being relatively new, it benefits from the many G-series wheels before it. Most games recognise the wheel natively and will set the controls accordingly, but for those that don’t there are tons of helpful guides on how to do so, either for the G923 or the G29 and G920. F1 2019 was the only game I had to hop into the options menu to setup, and I simply followed these guidelines from Reddit for the G29.

The Logitech G923 is much more of a competitive racing wheel than you’d expect.

One of the few changes with the G923 over its predecessor is the introduction of TrueForce, a software feature that translates in-game physics more accurately from game to wheel.

How to explain TrueForce in action… it’s sort of like a low humming as you glide over the track, which translates the finer features of the track into your wheel. I’d say it does feel like driving a car, at least more so than with it disabled, although it doesn’t feel like it’s usable information when racing. I enjoy the feel of it, it’s just limited in scope, and that’s both in terms of on-track feedback and support. TrueForce is currently supported in just seven games:

Project Cars 3, Assetto Corsa Competizione, Automobilista 2, GRID (2019), iRacing, Monster Truck Championship, and Snowrunner.

As a way of differentiating the G923 from its predecessors, perhaps that’s not all that convincing. As I mentioned, if it’s an upgrade from the G29 or G920 you’re looking for, this isn’t it.  

For new super licensees and growing gearheads there’s an well-rounded package here, though. The G923 is well-built: the rear may be plastic but the metal and leather finish on the wheel itself brings about longevity where it counts. Unfortunately, the inclusion of leather does mean this product isn’t vegan. 

The shifter paddles (flappy paddles) feel responsive and mechanically satisfying, too. My only concern with the construction is with the way the wheel attaches to a desk or frame. It’s not the most stable design, depending on your desk, and keeping it firmly planted can mean cranking the latches down pretty tight.

The maximum depth of the mounting system is 3.5 cm, with the plastic extension clips removed, so if your desk is thicker than that you’ll either have to screw the wheel in using the two threaded holes on the underside of the unit, or attach a thinner board and clamp that to your desk through other means.

(Image credit: Future)

Perhaps the best bit about the G923 package though is that it’s more than a racing wheel and wheelbase. It’s a set of three pedals, too, and really solid ones at that. I was pretty taken aback at the quality of these pedals the first time I used them, they have all the makings of higher-end pedals where it counts.

The accelerator delivers a decent linear press with a snappy return to keep it glued to your foot, while the clutch brings similarly swift response with increasing tension as you depress the pedal—enough to create a faux bite point. The brake pedal, however, is the highlight of the three. Slightly tweaked from the G920 and G29 design, a progressive spring design requires serious stomp power to use. So much so that the units carpet grip system is something of a necessity for serious racing, and you’ll want to consider a chair with lockable castors to keep you firmly in place and gunning for position in-game.

(Image credit: Future)

The pedals only add to what I feel is an already impressive package in the G923. An all-rounder like no other, you’re getting a wheel that not only feels great, it plays great too. I’ve failed up until this point to mention this wheel is simply great for racing. It’s not some tiny, gimmicky wheel that can nary stand up to a controller. It’s built for racing games. It makes the racing game experience addictive as heck, as I’ve waxed lyrical about already, but it will also allow you to be more accurate, faster with any luck, when racing.

If you’re a motorsport fan, a lapsed virtual racer, or a gamer looking to broaden your horizons with sim racing, the Logitech G923 is much more of a competitive racing wheel than you’d expect, and with a competitive price tag to match. Similarly, though, it’s still worth checking out the G29 and G920 while they’re still available, simply because they’re much of the same for less cash.

Read our review policy

Logitech G923 racing wheel review

From the brake pedal to the force feedback motors, the Logitech G923 racing wheel delivers at a grade that is hard to match at this price tag. Through and through, it delivers an experience that is at least comparable with pricier, more modular sets.

Jacob earned his first byline writing for his own tech blog from his hometown in Wales in 2017. From there, he graduated to professionally breaking things as hardware writer at PCGamesN, where he would later win command of the kit cupboard as hardware editor. Nowadays, as senior hardware editor at PC Gamer, he spends his days reporting on the latest developments in the technology and gaming industry. When he’s not writing about GPUs and CPUs, however, you’ll find him trying to get as far away from the modern world as possible by wild camping.

Logitech G Pro Racing Wheel and Pro Racing Pedals review

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

(Image: © Future)

Our Verdict

Harnessing the power of a direct drive wheelbase, the Pro Racing Wheel is a massive upgrade on Logitech’s previous offerings. The Pro Racing Pedals are the star of the show, however, with an excellent load-cell brake. Just be prepared to pay a pretty penny for all that horsepower under the hood.

For
  • 11Nm of torque
  • Highly customisable
  • Simple interface and button layout
  • Reprogrammable rear clutch paddles
  • Fantastic pedal set (sold separately to wheel)
  • Load-cell brake included
Against
  • Compatibility mode loses a few great features
  • Pricey for both wheel and pedals together
  • Large wheelbase footprint

PC Gamer’s got your back
Our experienced team dedicates many hours to every review, to really get to the heart of what matters most to you. Find out more about how we evaluate games and hardware.

No price information

Check Amazon

Logitech has made a name for itself in affordable PC racing wheels over the years, no more so than with the G29. You might also know its G920. Or the G923. Admittedly, there have been many cranks of the wheel for what’s all but the same product over the years—”if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”—but I promise you the new driving gear on my desk today are anything but the same old thing respun with a different number attached to it.

The Logitech Pro Racing Wheel and Pro Racing Pedals are a frightfully powerful combination for sim racing. The gear-driven motor system so often found in Logitech’s racing wheels is gone. In its stead, the Pro Racing Wheel comes with a direct drive motor that will shake you all the way down to your little racing booties.

Need proof of that? Logitech’s Pro Racing Wheel delivers a staggering 11Nm (Newton metres) of torque. That’s a massive amount of power to throw behind a racing wheel for a PC. If I hadn’t already rigorously stress tested my largely cardboard Ikea desk by standing on it multiple times to reach for something dangerously high up, I’d have suspected it would’ve ripped it in two by the sheer strength of the wheelbase motor. At the very least, it’s more than enough power to ignite that feeling of being behind the wheel of a race car as you throw it nose-first into a corner at high-speed (or perhaps into a barrier).

While there are direct drive wheelbases that can deliver torque in excess of 25Nm, the Logitech Pro Racing Wheel is comparatively powerful in its price bracket. Compared to the Fanatec CSL DD I have to hand, the Logitech’s 11Nm appears practically immense next to the Fanatec’s baseline 5Nm. However, the Fanatec wheelbase is capable of delivering up to 8Nm torque with a secondary adapter for extra dosh.

Pro Racing specs

Motor: direct drive
Paddles: magnetic gear shift paddles, dual clutch paddles
Wheel: 300mm diameter, removable
Compatibility: PC + PlayStation | PC + Xbox
Mounting: table clamp included, bolt holes for more secure fitting
Pedals: 3-pedal, load-cell brake, hall effect gas/clutch
Price: Pro Racing Wheel – $1,000 / £849| Pro Racing Pedals – $350 / £299

In regards to price, the Fanatec CSL DD 5nm kit is a little cheaper than the Logitech Pro Racing Wheel at $700, or $850 with the beefed up 8Nm boost kit, and it also comes with pedals. Whereas the Logitech G Pro Racing Wheel will set you back $1000, and if you want its excellent pedals as well, you’ll have to buy them separately for $350.

I certainly prefer to set up my racing wheel knowing that I’m going to be able to extract all the performance out of it right out of the box, though the Logitech does appear the less flexible option of the two considering its premium cost. There’s more wiggle room in the cost of a Fanatec package, depending on what you want out of it.

There are other reasons you might want to consider Logitech beyond a raw power advantage, however.

For starters, the Pro Racing Pedal set is absolutely superb. Yes, it is sold separately, and no it’s not exactly cheap. But it’s actually quite a good offer for the price. This is a three-pedal set, including two metal plated brake and clutch pedals and a large gas pedal. That’s not the best bit, though the inclusion of a clutch pedal as standard is much appreciated. The best bit is that the brake is a load-cell brake, which is something of a must-have feature for a racing sim fan that wants to really mimic the feeling of a race car’s brake system. Where a cheaper pedal might measure through travel, alongside a spring to add resistance, a load-cell brake measures via pressure. For that, it is a far closer match to real-life. Trust me, you can feel the difference in action.

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Future)(Image credit: Future)(Image credit: Future)

Not only does the Pro Racing Pedals come with a load-cell brake but it also feels superb under foot. The construction of the pedal set is unlike anything else I’ve used. It’s very smartly designed to hide away any cables and make it so it’s a simple and quick job to shift the location of each pedal to your preference. You just need to loosen a handful of bolts and you can shift the pedals side to side, which amounts to a quicker and more granular adjustment process than on the Fanatec CSL pedal set.

As I mentioned before, the load cell is the ideal brake system for replicating the feel of a real race car’s braking system, but it does come with a stipulation in order to use it effectively: you need to fix or butt it against something to make sure it’s secure, as a load-cell brake will require you to hoof the pedal with all your might to engage it.

Why can nobody make it around the first corner?!

While relatively stable by comparison to many of the racing wheels I’ve tested lately—including those from Thrustmaster, Logitech, and Fanatec—there’s really no getting away from the gradual slipping that will happen in some capacity when you put your full weight on the brake pedal. For better results, you’ll want to butt the pedal set up against the wall or install it within a larger frame. I went for the former and it worked a treat, though I’m eyeing up a more permanent racing rig solution. Just need to find somewhere to put it first.

Upwards from the pedals, Logitech has paid similar attention to detail in crafting the racing wheel itself. The wheel is fully removable and comes with a quick release so you can feel like the real deal as you disembark your machine at the end of a long and tiring race. Or if you want to throw your wheel away in pure rage because someone smashed into the back of your car for the upteenth time in an online F1 22 lobby and you can’t actually believe it’s happened again. Why can nobody make it around the first corner?! 

Sorry, but it seems even the best racing wheel in the world won’t teach you to back off and fight another day.

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Future)(Image credit: Future)(Image credit: Future)

Anyways, the wheel is available in either PlayStation or Xbox livery. There are only small differences, namely button labels, so you’re free to pick your poison. Both work just fine on PC, so PC gamers needn’t worry about compatibility, but I’ve opted for the PlayStation version for this review.

The Pro Racing Wheel comes in at 300mm in diameter, which is on the larger side, though I have found it to be a good fit for a wide range of racing games despite its size. It’s certainly very comfortable to use over long periods and for relatively disparate driving experiences: I’ve been testing across F1 22 and WRC 10, two racing games that couldn’t be further from one another, and the wheel is accurate and responsive in both. Though they are actually seeing the wheel as two fundamentally different things.

You see, one of the strengths of buying one of Logitech’s more popular racing wheels is that, as they’re so popular, they’re very widely supported in racing games. With a new wheel like the Pro, there’s no longer a fully-functioning preset for your wheel ready and raring to go as you boot a game. That can sometimes mean you just have to make one yourself, as is the case with F1 22, and Logitech has created a very handy webpage that will guide you through the best way to go about it. But in other games, like WRC 10, you will need to engage compatibility mode, or essentially, G923 mode.

A compatibility mode isn’t exactly a wild new idea in the world of racing wheels, many wheels offer them, but they are a handy technique to ensure functionality with a wider range of games. Those games that may have once been a complete nightmare to add wheel support to. You’re already thinking of Forza, but I’m not going to say it. 

I mention compatibility mode because when you read this next part, you should bear in mind that some of the functionality isn’t available in G923 mode, though most of the important stuff is.

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Future)(Image credit: Future)(Image credit: Future)

The G Pro Wheel is highly customisable. Either through the Logitech G app, or, as I found myself doing most often, via the display on the wheel base itself. From here, it’s easy to adjust settings on a per-game basis. You can even set up multiple profiles to keep track of these settings for each game, including options to adjust force feedback, Trueforce feedback, maximum wheel rotation, brake pedal sensitivity, and even what you want to use the second set of paddles on the rear of the wheel. These are stored on the wheel base too.

Speaking of which, this is another of the features that is worth talking about on the Pro Racing Wheel. You have your traditional paddle shifters on the rear of the Pro Racing Wheel but also dual clutch paddles beneath. The gear shifters use a magnetic actuation, which makes for incredibly swift and tactile response, however, the dual clutch paddles are a more gentle actuation. Though that’s handy for nailing smoother starts off the line. Though that’s only half the story. Via the aforementioned settings on the wheel base, you can set these dual clutch paddles to act as different functions. Perhaps the best use I’ve found for it is using the clutch paddle as a handbrake in games where that might be required. For someone like me without a dedicated handbrake accessory, this feature is great for nailing drifts (or trying to).

The Logitech Pro Racing kit feels as much a high-end offering in power and performance as it should for the price.

Though as I said before, that awesome customisable paddle functionality is only available if you’re opting to run in Pro mode, and not G923 mode. And unfortunately games like Forza and WRC, which I find myself trying to drift in, are better suited to G923 mode. You can try and program your own controls in these games using the Pro mode if you don’t mind tinkering for 20 minutes before gaming, however, so don’t completely discount your favourite racing games if they’re only recommended with G923 mode.

There is so much customisation on offer with the Logitech G Pro Racing Wheel and Pedals and it’s all within easy reach. Even the impressive force feedback can be adjusted to better take advantage of the information available to it on a per-game basis, and I’m talking about Logitech’s own Trueforce rumble feedback feature here, too.

Trueforce isn’t necessarily a reason to buy a racing wheel, but I’ll take it when offered. It’s effectively a way in which minor, let’s say, atmospheric rumbles are picked up from the game engine and translated through the wheel into your hands and arms. It’ll change how you perceive driving on a gravel road to smooth asphalt, or if you lose control and veer into grass becoming a very expensive, high-speed lawnmower. You’ll feel the difference, and it’s a neat effect.

But I’m impressed with the Logitech G Pro Racing Wheel and Pedals. Not only because of the serious step up in performance that this set offers over Logitech’s more popular G923-style models, but also that a direct drive wheelbase and high-quality wheel feels a very obvious step forward for Logitech’s racing wheels if done correctly, and Logitech has absolutely done it correctly here. I have no qualms about recommending the Pro Racing Wheel and Pedals for the racing rookie looking to level up their sim experience, or indeed even a more seasoned racer with ageing kit that needs a lick more power. 

However, I will say there’s still absolutely a place for more modular kits, such as those from the likes of Fanatec. The ability to piece together a racing sim rig over time, starting off with a cheaper, upgradeable unit, does appeal to me on a more practical level, and there’s no getting away from the complete Logitech solution’s $1,350 price tag all-in. That’s a lot of money to drop in one lump sum.

But I wouldn’t say you would come away disappointed had you spent that money on this racing wheel. The Logitech Pro Racing kit feels as much a high-end offering in power and performance as it should for the price, and it’ll come as no surprise that every detail and every material screams premium, long-lasting quality as we’ve come to expect from Logitech over the years.

Logitech G Pro Racing Wheel: Price Comparison

No price information

Check Amazon

powered by

Read our review policy

Logitech G Pro Racing Wheel

Harnessing the power of a direct drive wheelbase, the Pro Racing Wheel is a massive upgrade on Logitech’s previous offerings. The Pro Racing Pedals are the star of the show, however, with an excellent load-cell brake. Just be prepared to pay a pretty penny for all that horsepower under the hood.

Jacob earned his first byline writing for his own tech blog from his hometown in Wales in 2017. From there, he graduated to professionally breaking things as hardware writer at PCGamesN, where he would later win command of the kit cupboard as hardware editor. Nowadays, as senior hardware editor at PC Gamer, he spends his days reporting on the latest developments in the technology and gaming industry. When he’s not writing about GPUs and CPUs, however, you’ll find him trying to get as far away from the modern world as possible by wild camping.

Build PC for Logitech G29 Driving Force Racing Wheel (941-000112) Black with compatibility check and price analysis

Share

  • Specs
  • Video

Basic

Type Steering wheel
Purpose For game console
For PC
Compatible PS3
PS4
Windows
Connection Wired
Connection interface USB
Food From USB port

Manipulator interaction

Total number of buttons 18 buttons
Action buttons 4 action buttons (triangle, circle, cross, square)
Direction buttons D-pad (4 directions)
Feedback function Feedback

Optional

Features Integrated engine speed indicator
Optional Handlebar
Angle of rotation: 900 degrees lock-to-lock
Steering wheel position sensor with Hall effect
Dual motor force feedback mechanism
Overheat protection

Pedals
Non-linear brake pedal
Patented oval anti-slip system
Textured support for heels
Self-calibrating

Steering wheel spokes: anodized aluminum
Steering wheel cover: handmade leather
Steering shaft: steel
Paddle shifters: brushed stainless steel
Mounting clips: glass nylon
Pedal cages and arms: cold rolled steel
Pedal caps: brushed stainless steel

Material Metal and plastic
Dimensions Handlebar: 270 x 260 x 278 mm
Pedals: 167 x 428. 5 x 311
Weight 5350
Color Black

💕 Where can I buy Logitech G29 Driving Force Racing Wheel (941-000112) Black?

✅ What is the cheapest price for a product?

17 344 UAH

💎 How often is a product chosen?

1025 builds have been made with this product

Page not found

Delivery options and delivery speed may vary by location.

Sign in to manage addresses


OR

A country

AustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAnguillaAngolaAndorraAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAfghanistanBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBahrainBelarusBelizeBelgiumBeninBermudaBulgariaBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBrazilBritish Virgin IslandsBruneiBurki FasoBurundiBhutanVanuatuHungaryVenezuelaUSVirgin IslandsEast TimorVietnamGabonHaitiGuyanaGambiaGhanaGuadeloupeGuatemalaGuineaGuinea BissauGermanyGuernseyGibraltarHondurasHong Kong ChinaGrenadaGreenlandGreeceGuamDenmarkDemocratic Republic of the CongoJerseyDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEgyptZambiaZimbabweGoIsraelIndiaIndonesiaJordanIrelandIcelandSpainItalyCape VerdeKazakhstanCayman IslandsCambodiaCameroonCanadaCanary Islands,Caribbean NetherlandsQatarKenyaCyprusKiribatiChinaColombiaComorosKosovoCosta RicaIvory Coast arCubaKuwaitKyrgyzstanCuraçaoLaosLatviaLesothoLiberiaLebanonLithuaniaLiechtensteinLuxembourgMauritiusMauritaniaMadagascarMayotteMacao, ChinaMacedoniaMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaltaMoroccoMartiniqueMarshall IslandsMexicoMicronesiaMozambiqueMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontserratM Yanmar [Burma]NamibiaNauruNepalNigerNigeriaNetherlandsNicaraguaNiueNew ZealandNew CaledoniaNorwayUnited Arab EmiratesOmanCook IslandsTurks and Caicos IslandsPakistanPalauPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPolandPortugalPuerto RicoRepublic of the CongoReunionRussiaRwandaRomaniaSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSwazilandSaint HelenaSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesNorthern Mariana IslandsSeychellesSenegalSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSerbiaSingaporeSyriaSlovakiaSloveniaUnited KingdomUnited StatesSolomon IslandsSudanSudan rinamSierra LeoneTajikistanThailandTaiwan, ChinaTanzaniaTongaTrinidad and TobagoTuvaluTunisiaTurkmenistanTurkeyUgandaUzbekistanUkraineUruguayFaroe IslandsFijiPhilippinesFinlandFalkland IslandsFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaCroatiaChadMontenegroCzech RepublicChileSwitzerlandSweden ri-LankaEcuadorEquatorial GuineaEl SalvadorEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaSouth AfricaSouth KoreaJamaicaJapan

City

BerlinAach B TrierAach, HegauAachenAalenAarbergenAasbuettelAbbenrodeAbenbergAbensbergAbentheuerAbrahamAbsbergAbstattAbtsbessingenAbtsgmuendAbtsteinachAbtswindAbtweilerAchbergAchernAchimAchslachAchstettenAchtAchtbachAchterwehrAchtrupAckendorfAdde buellAdelbergAdelebsenAdelheidsdorfAdelmannsfeldenAdelschlagAdelsdorfAdelsheimAdelshofen, Kr FuerstenfeldbruckAdelshofen, MittelfrAdelsriedAdelzhausenAdenauAdenbachAdenbuettelAdendorfAderstedtAdlersteigeAdligstadtAdlkofenAdmannshagen-BargeshagenAdorf/Vogtl.

220 to 110 volts converter: The 5 Best 220 to 110 Adapters (2023 Review)

Опубликовано: August 9, 2022 в 4:36 pm

Автор:

Категории: Miscellaneous

Simran SMF-200K 200 Watt Step Down Converter Adapter Set 220 to 110 Volt EU UK AU US Plug







Home > Travel Voltage Converters >

New!

Price: $30.95






Quantity:

Description

Simran SMF-200K Watt 220/240V to 110/120V AC Step Down Travel Voltage Converter And Adapter Set SMF200K

  • Converts 220V/240V AC foreign electricity to 110V /120V AC 50/60 HZ
  • Pure AC Output for use with all types of appliances rated 1-200 Watts
  • 200 Watt 220 volt to 110/120 volt AC – Step Down Travel Converter
  • Input: 220/240V 50/60Hz
  • Output: 110/120V 50/60Hz
  • Output socket accepts both U.S. 2 prong and 3 prong regular plugs.
  • Fitted with Type C European Plug
  • Two round pin plug type C fitted to the power cord good for use in many European and Asian countries.
  • Includes 3 Style Of Adapter Plugs for UK, Australia, USA (Type G, Type I, Type A)
  • Led indicator light. Fuse protected

Product Dimensions: 5 x 3.5 x 3.5 inches

Item Weight: 1.8 Lbs.

Shipping Weight: 2 Lbs.

Suitable for use with charging Blackberry, iPods, Phones, Cameras, Laptops, Hand held games, fax machines, and light portable equipment.
Do not use with hair dryers, hair straighteners, heating appliances, power tools and big household appliances.

CAUTION: Make sure the wattage and voltage of your appliance or equipment and the wattage of the transformer is suitable for each other.






New!




Simran SMF-200K 200 Watt Step Down Converter Adapter Set 220 to 110 Volt EU UK AU US Plug

Price: $30. 95



Featured!






Seven Star 100 Watts Step Up Down Compact Voltage Converter 100W

Price: $19.95



Featured!






4-Pack Norstar 200 Watt Compact Voltage Converter Transformer Step Down 220V To 110V

Price: $63.99



Featured!






Seven Star F-200W 200 W Watt Compact Voltage Converter 220v to 110v Transformer for Electronics

Price: $22.95



Simran THG-200W 200 Watt Step Down Voltage Converter 220v to 110v Transformer

Simran THG-200W 200 Watt Step Down Voltage Converter 220v to 110v Transformer










Home > Step Down Voltage Converters Power Transformers >

Price: $28. 95






Quantity:

Description

 This Simran THG-200 200 watts max load, converts 220/240 volt foreign electricity to 110/120 volt North American electricity allowing to use standard American appliances and electronics in foreign countries. The Power cord has built-in European/Asian style grounded plug that fits in most European countries so no additional plug adapters required. This metal cased high quality transformer is designed for continuous use. CE Approved model.

  • Heavy Duty Grounded step down transformer for continuous use.
  • To use North American 110/120 volt appliances in foreign countries with 220/230/240 volt electricity
  • Converts 220-240 volts down to 110-120 volts
  • Perfect for use with Home Electronics, Computers, Kitchen Appliances and other Electrical Devices
  • 200 w watts maximum capacity
  • Shock proof sockets
  • North American receptacle: (Unit socket) accepts 2 prong non-grounded or 3 prong grounded U. S. plug
  • Euro/Asian power cord with Schuko Grounded plug
  • 4.8mm plug diameter
  • Input 220 volt 50hz Single Phase
  • Output 110 Volt 50hz
  • For Export Overseas Use (Not Compatible for use in North America).
  • Specifications

    • Dimensions: L – 4.25″ x W – 3″ x H – 2.75″ approx.
    • Weight: 3.5 lbs approx
    • CE Approved Model Simran THG200

    Additional Information

    CAUTION: Make sure the wattage and voltage of your appliance or equipment and the wattage of the transformer is suitable for each other, and the proper input voltage is selected on the back of the transformer according to the country of use before you connect the transformer and turn it ON. Failure to follow the instructions may result in damage to the transformer and the appliance.

    What’s in the Box

    • THG200 Step Down Converter x 1







    Simran THG200 200 W Watt Step Down Voltage Converter 220v to 110v Transformer

    Price: $28. 95



    Featured!






    Seven Star F-200W 200 W Watt Compact Voltage Converter 220v to 110v Transformer for Electronics

    Price: $22.95



    Featured!






    Simran 10000 W Watt Step Down Power Transformer 220v to 110v Voltage Converter 10000W

    Price: $429.99



    Featured!






    4-Pack Norstar 200 Watt Compact Voltage Converter Transformer Step Down 220V To 110V

    Price: $63.99




    Transformers from 220 to 110 and from 110 to 220

    First, let’s define what it is all about? This is a device that changes the characteristics of AC input/output. The design consists of two windings, one winding receives alternating current from the source, and the second one is discharged with changed characteristics. For example, we have a car – a source of electricity with a voltage of 12 volts and a smartphone that needs to be charged from 220. You can connect a smartphone directly, but it will not charge. But if you use a transformer 12-220, then at the output we will get a suitable indicator, as well as a charged smartphone.

    All inverters differ in their input/output voltage. Some only increase low input parameters, others only decrease, and still others work both ways. Let’s take a closer look at each type.

    To a person far from electricians, such a device will seem absurd: why convert 220 to 220 volts? But everything is not so simple. The condition of most power lines in Russia and the CIS leaves much to be desired: worn-out equipment, regular breakdowns, and accidents lead to inconstancy of network parameters. The differences are especially noticeable in country houses, rural areas, and old urban areas. But modern technology requires a stable 220 volts, and with sudden drops it can fail. That is why there is a need to use transformers 220-220. They are also called distribution – in everyday life they even out the performance of the network, smooth out jumps, drops, which protect equipment from breakdowns.

    In addition, the distribution transformer acts as an “airbag”, preventing the electric circuit from closing on a person. If all household appliances are connected through it, then when you touch a bare wire or appliance, a person will not be shocked. Safety is ensured by the absence of a ground loop in the secondary winding. With such a scheme, a person cannot become the closing link in the chain, which protects him from electric shocks, burns, and injuries. It is especially important to take care of safety where there are small children.

    Step-up / step-down transformers 220

    The names fully reflect the specifics: the step-down transformer converts electric current from 220 to 110 volts, and the step-up transformer, vice versa, from 110 to 220. The choice of one or another variety depends on what voltage the source and which is required for the operation of appliances, household appliances, tablets, phones.

    220 to 110 converters allow you to connect devices operating from 110 volts to a 220 network. You have probably come across this compact assistant before. The simplest example is an adapter for gadgets with a flat plug that changes 220 to 110. These are not uncommon in Europe, America, and Asian countries.

    Converter 12 to 220 is also called a car inverter. This small device makes it possible to use familiar equipment anywhere, having only a car. With it, you can connect an electric shaver, laptop, coffee maker or car vacuum cleaner through the car battery or cigarette lighter. Converter 12-220 is indispensable during a long trip, traveling on your own or hiking, out of town.

    Should I buy a universal converter?

    In addition to those discussed above, there are also universal transformers 110-220 and 110 to 220 volts. They are worth buying if you are planning a trip to Japan, America or Thailand. Such a converter will allow you to connect your favorite gadgets: a razor, charging a mobile phone or camera, an epilator. Typically, the device is equipped with adapters for sockets with flat connectors, and the converter itself is equipped with an overheating fuse. Can be used with both flat and round forks.

    In the online store zapitatel.ru you can purchase transformers of all types considered. There are both simple adapters for sockets, and converters with enhanced output voltage stability. To purchase, add the product to the cart, place an order, specify the delivery address. If you are not sure which converter is right for you, call us or contact us through the website – we will help you choose, advise, and tell you about the features.

    Adapters 220/110V


    Voltage converters – PT220-110V are designed to power collector AC motors, as well as heaters of all types with an operating voltage of 110V, TTN-30 220-110V – step-down autotransformers, designed to power appliances AC voltage 100 V up to 50 W from a standard power supply voltage 220 V Equipped with a universal socket for European and American standards.

    Name

    Power (kW), max

    U supply (V) single phase

    U out (V), at I nom

    I nom

    I min

    Time (minutes) work / break
    with load

    Description

    PT220-110-1800 1.8 220+10%-15% 110±5 in 15 A 3.5 A ≤2 / ≥10
    — / —
    watch
    PT220-110-2800 2.8 220+10%-15% 110±5 in 15 A 3.5 A ≤2 / ≥10
    ≤120 / ≥20
    watch
    PT220-110-2800/2 2. 8 220+10%-15% 110±5 in 15 A 3.5 A ≤120 / ≥20
    ≤400 / ≥20
    watch
    TTN-7 220-110V 12W 0.012 220+10%-15% 104±5 in 0.1 A Unlimited watch
    TTN-30 220-110 V 50 W 0.05 220+10%-15% 104±5 in 0.5 A Unlimited watch

    Voltage converters — ПТ220-110-1800, 2800, 2800/2 — designed to power collector AC motors, as well as heaters of all types with an operating voltage of 110 V.

    Converters thyristor single-phase PT220-110-1800 and single-phase thyristor PT220-110-2800 (see photo 1) have a unified design. The converter is installed in a housing with a mains plug for connecting the ~220 V supply voltage. It also has a socket for connecting a ~110 V load, an automatic switch for protection against short-circuit currents and an electronic circuit that changes the effective voltage value at the load. Converters thyristor single-phase PT220-110-1800 and thyristor single-phase PT220-110-2800 do not have galvanic isolation from the network. The output voltage is regulated by pulse-width conversion of the input voltage. Converters thyristor single-phase PT220-110-1800 and thyristor single-phase PT220-110-2800 can be used for short-term power supply of active and active-inductive loads up to 1800 W for PT220-110-1800 and up to 2800 W for PT220-110-2800. The voltage at the output of the converter is set by the manufacturer at 120 V when operating on an active resistance of 45 ohms (3.5 A).

    The voltage adjustment at the output of the converter is available in specialized workshops and can be performed in the range from 90 V to 150 V with a resistor included in the electronic unit.

    Thyristor converter PT220-110-2800/2 (see photo 2) has a power cord for connecting a ~220 V supply voltage, a socket for connecting a ~110 V load, an automatic switch for protection against short-circuit currents and an electronic circuit that produces change in the effective value of the voltage on the load. The single-phase thyristor converter PT220-110-2800/2 has no galvanic isolation from the network. The output voltage is regulated by pulse-width conversion of the input voltage. The single-phase thyristor converter PT220-110-2800/2 can be used to power active and active-inductive loads for 120 minutes for a load with a power of up to 1800 W (Inom), respectively, or for 400 minutes for a load with a power of up to 1000 W (0.5xI) respectively. number ). The voltage at the output of the converter is set by the manufacturer at the level of 110-120 V when operating on an active resistance of 45 ohms. (3.5 A).

    TTN-30 220-110 V – step-down autotransformers (see photo 3), designed to power devices with alternating current of 100 V with a power of up to 50 W from a standard 220 V power supply. This autotransformer can be ordered with voltages of 90, 100, 110 , 120, 130 V. If the power or the indicated voltages are not sufficient to power the equipment, we will calculate and manufacture autotransformers according to individual requirements, while the power of the autotransformer can be increased up to 1 kW.

    The autotransformer has a universal socket for European and American standards, which allows you to directly connect (without modification) equipment made in the USA, Japan, as well as equipment manufactured in other countries for these markets.

    The autotransformer is immune to input voltage increase up to 260 V, which ensures its trouble-free operation in Russian power grids. The autotransformer can be used as a step-up in 127 V networks to power equipment designed for a voltage of 220 V. An ergonomic case with good ventilation allows the autotransformer to be used for a long time at rated load. The autotransformer has two degrees of protection – a fuse for protection against short circuits in the load and a thermal fuse for protection against overheating and fire.

    Greenbatteries: Rechargeable Batteries | Chargers | Battery Testers & Accessories

    Опубликовано: August 8, 2022 в 4:36 pm

    Автор:

    Категории: Miscellaneous

    Rechargeable Batteries | Chargers | Battery Testers & Accessories

    We are dedicated to providing helpful information regarding the use of rechargeable batteries and chargers, to increase their use and to contribute in a small way to a more sustainable future for our planet.

    Batteries are an integral part of our lives in the 21st century and regardless of whether you use single use batteries or rechargeable batteries it is essential that you use them effectively so that you get the most out of your battery investment.

    Whether you are looking for rechargeable batteries out of concern for the environment, for the superior power of rechargeable batteries, or for the money you will save, Greenbatteries.com is the best site to help you make an environmentally friendly rechargeable battery purchase.

    Every year over 15 billion batteries are produced and sold worldwide. Many are alkaline batteries which are discarded after a single use. Fortunately, thanks to ongoing advances in both rechargeable batteries and battery chargers, single use alkaline batteries can largely be replaced with higher capacity, environmentally friendly, rechargeable Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH), Nickel Zinc(NiZN) or Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries that last far longer in high drain devices – each time they are charged – and can be used many hundreds of times. ..saving you tons of money. There are, of course, still many requirements for Nickel Cadmium and Lead Acid batteries too and we help you to be responsible for their use too by recycling them after they are no longer usable.

    In the battery FAQ sections on our site you will find up-to-date information on rechargeable batteries and battery chargers. We’ll explain the different types of batteries and offer suggestions for selecting the right rechargeable batteries and battery chargers for your specific requirements. We have also recently added a web log for articles to our site so that we can add articles of interest and include some of the questions that our customers ask us about the different types of rechargeable batteries, chargers and other topics of interest. We now carry many kinds of laptop batteries and sealed lead acid batteries in response to many customer requests.

    If you are at all like us, you will only settle for products that deliver all of the power you need for your electronic devices.

    Take a look at some comments from a few of our loyal customers:

    Finally a good battery… 
    “Since I have had the new cells from Greenbatteries the recharging process has NEVER malfunctioned once.… Anyone who is suffering because of short battery life or the high cost of manufacturer replacements, need not, because you have a GREAT product at a GREAT price! Continue the good work!” 
    Sincerely, Jim Cooper

    The lasting quality is fantastic… 
    “I have been using Green Batteries in my Canon digital camera for 3 years and they are still good. The lasting quality is fantastic. Last year I went on a sailboat for 7 days and took more then a 100 pictures without needing to change the batteries for recharging. Keep up the good work.” 
    Bob Simmons 
    Spokane, Washington

    Very pleased not only with the service but the quality of the merchandise… 
    “I’ve used Green Batteries for some time now in all my AA and AAA battery applications. It’s very convenient to keep a supply charged up and ready to go for flashlights, GPS receivers, Walkie Talkies, Radios, etc. I’ve been very pleased not only with the service but the quality of the merchandise. 
    Thank you”
     Al Bentley 
    Orlando

    I don’t buy my rechargeable batteries and accessories anywhere else… 
    “I started shopping at Greenbatteries online about four years ago when I was looking for a rechargeable, more environmentally friendly solution for powering my Palm PDA. Service and shipping was prompt and friendly, and the batteries have lasted all this time, along with a reliable charger. The Palm and the batteries and charger have now passed on to my brother. Now I’ve ordered more batteries for wireless devices, keyboards, mice, and my bluetooth keyboard that accompanies my new Pocket PC. We even have two sets for our digital camera. I don’t buy my rechargeable batteries and accessories anywhere else… Your products and service have never let me down! 
    The Rev. Richard E. Helmer

    Extremely useful and helpful info 
    “I just wanted to thank you for the extremely useful and helpful info about rechargeable batteries that I found on your website. I was about to return my digital camera because I thought it must be broken as it was eating through alkaline batteries like crazy! …After doing some quick research on your website, I now realize that if I simply purchase NiMH rechargable batteries I should be fine! 
    Thanks again!!
     Angela 🙂 
    Nova Scotia, Canada

    Our greenbatteries.com customers have come to rely on us for their rechargeable batteries because:

    • We carry high quality, high capacity batteries, name brand batteries that are guaranteed to meet or exceed the performance of your original batteries and that means that you can use your electronic device for hours and hours without having to recharge.
    • Our batteries last longer per charge and will last longer overall because whenever possible we only carry name brand battery cells.
    • We primarily carry environmentally friendly rechargeable batteries so you can feel good about having a positive impact on our environment when you use your batteries.
    • In our store you will find a select number of premium quality products at very competitive prices so you will save lots of money.

    If you are looking for a specific battery or charger, please use the search feature on the left or you can compare nimh battery chargers, stock up on rechargeable d cell batteries, get a nb2l digital camera battery, or get some rechargeable NiMH batteries, for high drain applications or some rechargeable alkaline batteries for general use.

    Our NiMH Rechargeable Radio Batteries are higher capacity, environmentally friendly, and will save you lots of money. Our NiMH and Lithium Ion rechargeable digital camera batteries are guaranteed to work with your digital camera.

     All purchases in our greenbatteries.com store include a risk-free no-hassle 30 day money back guarantee.

    In addition, all of our products are warranted for a full year to ensure your complete satisfaction.

    Whatever your rechargeable battery and charger needs, begin your greenbatteries.com experience today!

    • You get free plastic battery cases with every four AA rechargeable batteries.
    • Free UPS Ground shipping on all orders placed online of $70.00 or more. (See instructions on order checkout page)
    • We offer online shipment tracking with UPS and USPS.
    • We accept all major credit cards(and Paypal).
    • All personal information you submit is encrypted and 100% secure

    The Dirty Truth About Green Batteries

    If we’re going to avoid the worst consequences of climate change, we’ll need an energy revolution. Specifically, we need to replace our dirty, fossil fuel-based grids and dirty, fossil fuel-powered vehicles with clean, carbon-free grids, and electric vehicles that charge off them. But there’s a big problem.

    Making that future a reality will, among other things, require a lot of batteries: batteries to charge our electric cars; batteries to store solar power collected while the sun’s up and wind power harnessed when it’s gusty out. And as a new report by researchers at the University of Technology Sydney warns, that’s likely to drive demand for the metals used to build green batteries—as well as wind turbines and solar panels—through the roof.

    In other words the clean tech boom is, at least in the short term, likely to fuel a mining boom. And that won’t come without cost.

    “We already know about the environmental, social, and human rights impacts extraction is posing to front line communities right now,” Payal Sampat, mining program director at Earthworks, which commissioned the new report, told Earther. “It’s kind of unimaginable to think about… how it would be considered sustainable to scale up those impacts that many fold and still be reaping benefits.

    Much like our smartphones and computers, the high-tech energy infrastructure of tomorrow requires a host of metals and minerals from across the periodic table and the planet. The lithium-ion batteries used in EVs and energy storage require not just lithium, but often cobalt, manganese, and nickel. Electric vehicle engines rely on rare earths, as do the permanent magnet-based generators inside some wind turbines. Solar panels gobbles up a significant share of the world’s supply of tellurium, and gallium, along with a sizable fraction of mined silver and indium. Most renewable technologies demand heaps of copper and aluminum.

    Our appetite for these metals will only grow as these technologies proliferate. While that basic fact has been known for years, the new report takes things a step further by working out the projected demand for 14 critical metals if humanity were to limit global warming to the Paris Agreement target of 1.5 degrees Celsius, by shifting to 100 percent renewable energy by mid-century. In a scenario the authors describe “very ambitious”, the 2050 energy mix is mainly wind and solar PV-driven, with smaller fractions of our energy coming from geothermal power, hydropower, and other technologies. The transportation sector is also 100 percent renewable, with over half of all cars, buses, and commercial vehicles being battery-driven electric or plug-in hybrids.

    That future sounds great from a climate perspective. But as the new analysis shows, it also creates some daunting materials challenges.

    In the authors’ scenarios, annual demand for lithium, as well as the rare earths neodymium and dysprosium, for batteries and EV engines, exceed current production rates by 2022. Batteries will also drive cobalt and nickel demand higher than current production around 2030, while tellurium demand for solar PV will peak well above current production rates in the late 2020s to mid 2030s.

    It gets worse. By mid-century, even in the most optimistic scenarios, the battery sector’s cobalt appetite is projected to exceed known planetary reserves, while our lithium demand will have eaten up at least 86 percent of known reserves. This doesn’t mean we will “run out” of these metals—known reserves simply refers to the metals that are currently economical to mine, and that can change over time—but it does serve to highlight just how big of a player batteries will be in fueling our material appetite in the decades to come. Lead study author Elsa Dominish told Earther via email that for lithium and cobalt at least, new mining seems “inevitable.”

    “Where new mining is needed, it’s really going to have to be far more responsible and with far smaller ecological and human footprints.”

    The numbers and forecasts in the report were not surprising to David Abraham, a senior fellow at New America who wrote a book on rare metals that discusses the clean tech boom’s role in shaping future supply risks.

    “What’s happened is many of these materials make products lighter, stronger, more powerful,” Abraham told Earther. “And that’s exactly what we want from green technologies. We want the products to be as efficient as possible. ” It’s also why we depend on very specific metals to build them and why those metals aren’t always easily substituted.

    For batteries, the authors say the most important way to offset rising demand for key metals is to beef up recycling, something that currently isn’t happening at a large scale.

    “Rates are very, very low for lithium ion battery recycling even though it’s something everyone seems to be offering as a solution,” Clare Church, a researcher at the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) who authored a separate recent report making a case for cobalt and lithium recycling, told Earther.

    As Church’s report points out, there are several reasons this, including technological limitations and inadequate regulation. Developing the infrastructure to collect and extract the metals out of spent batteries will require considerable effort, and absent governments that clearly designate who’s responsible and set ambitious targets, businesses often simply aren’t taking it upon themselves to make the initial investments. That’s despite what the report describes as a “considerable economic opportunity” in recycled lithium and cobalt—one that could be worth $23 billion by 2025, according to Reuters.

    Some companies, however, are starting to recognize the opportunity. This week, Tesla announced it’s developing a battery recycling system at its Gigafactory 1 plant that will “process both battery manufacturing scrap and end-of-life batteries” with the aim of recovering critical metals. Meanwhile metals company American Manganese, which has partnered with the Department of Energy’s Critical Materials Institute on battery recycling, recently patented a technology to efficiently extract all of the metals from the cathode of lithium-ion batteries, including lithium which pretty much isn’t recycled at all today.

    “I think it’s the greatest thing I’ve ever got my hands on,” American Manganese CEO Larry Reaugh told Earther in reference to the potential market in metals from spent batteries.

    Church said it’s also important to think about how batteries, especially those in cars, can be re-used before the recycling stage.

    “A lot of these batteries, when they reach end-of-life, still have a lot of energy capacity available,” she said. Even if an EV battery burns out to the point that it’s no longer safe to use in a car, it might still be perfectly good for another application, like home energy storage.

    “A lot of these batteries, when they reach end-of-life, still have a lot of energy capacity available.”

    For some technologies, like solar PV, there’s an opportunity to reduce the use of rare metals through increased efficiency, according to the University of Technology Sydney report. And Church said that for large, stationary batteries that store energy from wind and solar farms, we might be able to swap lithium-ion for a different emerging technology, so-called vanadium flow batteries which, in a delightfully nerdy blog post, she suggested might be the “Valyrian steel” of rechargeable battery tech.

    But even with more recycling and technological breakthroughs it’s hard to escape the conclusion that a battery and renewably-powered future will mean more mining, especially in the near future. And if today’s mining industries are any indicator, that will have environmental and human consequences.

    Take cobalt, which many lithium ion battery manufacturers add to improve energy density. Today, nearly 60 percent of it is sourced from the Democratic Republic of Congo, contributing to some of the worst pollution on the planet as mining and smelting cause heavy metals to seep into the air, water and soil. Cobalt mining has also fueled notorious human rights abuses, including relying extensively on child labor and forcing miners to work in incredibly dangerous conditions.

    Or you can look at lithium, which is mined mainly in the “lithium triangle” between Argentina, Bolivia and Chile. While many mines seem well managed the industry’s presence has raised concerns about freshwater contamination and conflict with local communities, per the new report. Or the a nickel refinery in Australia that closed after it was found to be dumping toxic wastewater onto the Great Barrier Reef. Last year, that refinery was set to re-open amidst rising nickel demand fueled by the EV sector.

    None of this is to say the clean energy revolution shouldn’t happen. But as Sampat put it, “where new mining is needed, it’s really going to have to be far more responsible and with far smaller ecological and human footprints.”

    The entire point of the report, she said, was to get that idea on relevant stakeholders’ radars, from policymakers to those who buy minerals, to ensure more responsible sourcing moving forward. She said that in talking with R&D folks in the renewable energy and battery space, a lot of them “truly believe that they’re helping to save the world.”

    “And they’re surprised by this information and don’t want to be part of the problem,” Sampat continued. “So I think there is an opportunity for information to result in shifts.”

    But given the pace at which science demands we confront the climate crisis, these shifts need to happen quickly. “We’re in the middle of a crisis both on the climate side and the mining side,” Sampat said. “It’s not like we have a whole lot of time to make these adjustments.”

    Green Batteries: Eco-startup for Smartphones

    Quick Energy Technologies positions itself as an innovative and at the same time “green” startup. His solution is Quick E , disposable chargers for mobile phones and portable devices. It seemed to be nothing special. At AliExpress there are dozens of similar offers. But the devices of the London project are made from recycled materials, do not leave traces of toxic elements during processing, and cost an order of magnitude less than their competitors – from £1.99 ($2.77) to £3.59 ($5). At the end of last year, the founders of the company Dragan Jovanovic ( Dragan Jovanovic ) and Stefan Paris Michael introduced the product to the UK market, and after the debut at the exhibition CES -2018 in La from Vegas getting ready to expansion in the USA. What else is attractive about this project?

    Photo: pexels.com

    Accidents are not accidental

    Stefan Paris Michael0004 came to the UK from Limassol (Cyprus) to study economics at City University London. With the future business partner Dragan Jovanovic met through a mutual friend in the first year. Jovanovich turned out to be a countryman and, as it turned out later, even studied with him at the same school for some time. The idea for Quick-E came to friends three years ago. They, then still sophomores, walked with friends around the shopping center and accidentally dispersed in different directions. Both tried to call their comrades, but the phones were dead, and the chargers, as is often the case, were left at home. The nearest electrical shops did not save the situation – the new battery was dead, the charging wires were sold separately, and the price reached as much as £25 ($35).

    After this audit, we thought that this story happens to everyone, and we need a more effective way to solve the problem of ,” Michael recalls.

    Long-term research has shown a gap in the market – everyone makes disposable batteries and then disposes of them, damaging the environment – toxic elements are released from devices when damaged. The partners made a bet on recycling and “zero waste”.

    During the prototyping process, of course, we faced many challenges – for example, how to make the product as small as possible and at the same time provide enough power for the end user, how to develop a cheap chip and achieve an efficiency ratio of more than 90% how to prevent self-discharge while the product is on the shelf in store ,” says Stefan Paris Michael.

    Two years and five patents – the effort was not in vain: the Quick-E prototype really turned out to be compact. It was easily “glued” to the back of the smartphone ( , the creators of the project assure that after removing the device, there are no traces of glue left on the phone – ed. ). In order for the battery to fall into the hands of the buyer fully charged, the circuit used a magnetic sealed contact ( the main component of the contact relay system in various electromagnetic circuits – . ).

    « The magnet in the connector (contact) ensures that the circuit is always open and no current can flow until the connector is pulled out to charge the device ,” explains the co-founder of Quick Energy Technologies.

    A new direction

    The London-based startup raised $400,000 in seed capital to refine the prototype. At the end of 2017, the production prototype was ready for mass production. A factory in China undertook to manufacture disposable charging batteries. The partners ordered the packaging in Luxembourg. In January 2018, just before CES in Las Vegas, 10,000 Quick-E units hit the UK market. The solution is presented in six versions, all batteries of different sizes, but suitable for Android and iPhone smartphones, as well as for laptops.

    Quick-Es with a battery size of 1620 (mAh) retails for £1.99 ($2.77), Quick-Es 2200 (mAh) costs £2.49 ($3.45) and 7000 (mAh) costs £3.59 ($5) is for laptops like the Apple MacBook and Google Chrombooks with a USB Type-C connector. To keep the price low, the owners of Quick Energy Technologies are selling disposable rechargeable batteries inside prepaid envelopes. The strategy is simple: when the battery runs out, the customer must toss it in an envelope into one of London’s famous red mailboxes. There are 116,000 of them in the UK, Stefan Paris Michael adds. You can find mailboxes, as well as points of sale, through the Quick-E mobile application.

    At the collection point at Quick Energy Technologies, batteries that arrive by mail are recharged (up to 500 times) and then returned to the market. You will not be able to charge the battery yourself at home – the own Quick-E port will not allow you to perform this simple operation. The company sends used batteries to a recycling plant.

    Every part of our devices is recycled or reused ,” Stefan points out. — Product leaves zero traces of thallium “.

    Early in the year, Quick Energy Technologies debuted at CES in Las Vegas. The United States has become interested in the developments of the London startup. To start selling there, the project announced a new round of funding.

    As soon as we attract investments, we will produce another 180 thousand units and go to other countries ,” says Michael.

    If the startup succeeds in raising funds before April, the owners say the company could reach $4.2 million in turnover by the end of the year. The co-owners of Quick Energy Technologies are already making plans to expand into other markets. Priority is given to countries with developed integrated postal services.

    Russia is also important to us ,” says Stefan Paris Michael. – We are both related to her: I grew up in Limassol – most of my classmates and friends are Russians, including a friend who moved to Cyprus from Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. In addition, Dragan lived in Moscow as a child and speaks Russian fluently. Therefore, Quick-E will appear in Russia – it’s only a matter of time .

    Author: Olga Grinevich

    Photos courtesy of Quick Energy Technologies

    Loading… 5mm

    • Features
    • Reviews
    • Manual
    • Video
    • Store addresses

    fireworks YOLKI GREEN 49 volleys

    Mytishchi, st. Mira 32/2 Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of shopping center 4 DAILY in stock
    Mytishchi, Dmitrovskoe highway p.4 Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of 5 Planet shopping center available
    Pushkino, 33rd km of M8 highway, bld.
    Yaroslavl, 123 Leningradsky pr.
    Yaroslavl, st. Dorozhnaya 6 A, Box of Fireworks in front of the shopping center Yaroslavsky Vernissage in stock
    Balashikha, sh. Enthusiasts 48, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of Globus Hypermarket available
    Vladimir, Suzdalsky pr. 28, Fireworks box in the parking lot of Globus Hypermarket available
    Kaluga, st. Generala Popova 1A, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of Globus Hypermarket available
    Podolsk, md. Klimovsk, st. Molodezhnaya 11, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of Globus 9 Hypermarket0148

    in stock
    Moscow, st. Alexandra Monakhova, 61 building 1, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of the Globus Hypermarket available
    Korolev, st. Communal 1, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of the Globus Hypermarket available
    Odintsovo, Yudino 55E, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of the Globus Hypermarket available
    Ryazan, Dyadkovo 1, Fireworks Box in the parking lot of Globus 9 Hypermarket0148

    in stock
    Tula, st. Arcadia Shipunova 1A, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of the Globus Hypermarket available
    Shchelkovo, 18 Proletarsky pr.
    Elektrostal, Random settlement, array 1, Fireworks box in the parking lot of the Globus Hypermarket in stock
    Yaroslavl, Krasny Bor 1B, Fireworks Box in the parking lot of GM Globus in stock
    Yaroslavl, st. Trufanova 24 V, Box of Fireworks opposite the Pobeda shopping center available
    Vologda, st. Far 33, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of Maxi Hypermarket available
    Cherepovets, st. Arkhangelskaya 43Fireworks box at Maxi Hypermarket in stock
    Cherepovets, Oktyabrsky pr. 25, Box of Fireworks at Maxi Hypermarket in stock
    Rybinsk, st. Furmanova 4, Box of Fireworks at Hypermarket Maxi in stock
    Vologda, st. Chernyshevsky 88, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of Maxi Supermarket available
    Vologda, Poshekhonskoe sh. 22, a box of fireworks in the parking lot of the mall Marmelad available
    Vologda, st. Puteyskaya 1 A, Box of Fireworks in stock
    Vologda, Okruzhnoe sh. 12, a box of fireworks in the parking lot of the mall RIO available
    Balashikha, st. Prigorodnaya 92, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of the shopping center StroyTrakt available
    Tula, st. Puteyskaya, d. 5, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of the shopping center Sarafan
    Yaroslavl, pr.0147 in stock
    Kaluga region, Kaluga, Grabtsevskoe shosse, 59 available
    available
    • Model: BFB301
    • Manufacturer: FIREWORKS BOX
    • Availability: In stock

    7 499 rub.

    Ask for a price

    0132

  • Video
  • Store addresses
  • fireworks YOLKI GREEN 49 volleys

    Mytishchi, st. Mira 32/2 Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of shopping center 4 DAILY in stock
    Mytishchi, Dmitrovskoe highway p.4 Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of 5 Planet shopping center available
    Pushkino, 33rd km of M8 highway, bld.
    Yaroslavl, 123 Leningradsky pr.
    Yaroslavl, st. Dorozhnaya 6 A, Box of Fireworks in front of the Yaroslavl Vernissage shopping mall available
    Balashikha, sh. Enthusiasts 48, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of Globus Hypermarket available
    Vladimir, Suzdalsky pr.0148

    in stock
    Kaluga, st. Generala Popova 1A, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of Globus Hypermarket available
    Podolsk, md. Klimovsk, st. Molodyozhnaya 11, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of Globus Hypermarket available
    Moscow, st. Alexandra Monakhova, 61 building 1, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of the Globus Hypermarket available
    Korolev, st. Communal 1, Fireworks Box in the parking lot of Globus 9 Hypermarket0148

    in stock
    Odintsovo, Yudino 55E, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of the Globus Hypermarket available
    Ryazan, Dyadkovo 1, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of Globus Hypermarket available
    Tula, st. Arcadia Shipunova 1A, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of the Globus Hypermarket available
    Shchelkovo, Proletarsky pr. 18, Fireworks box in the parking lot of the Globus Hypermarket in stock
    Elektrostal, Random settlement, array 1, Fireworks box in the parking lot of the Globus Hypermarket in stock
    Yaroslavl, Krasny Bor 1B, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of GM Globus available
    Yaroslavl, st. Trufanova 24 V, Box of Fireworks opposite the Pobeda shopping center available
    Vologda, st. Far 33, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of Maxi Hypermarket in stock
    Cherepovets, st. Arkhangelskaya 43Fireworks box at Maxi Hypermarket in stock
    Cherepovets, Oktyabrsky pr. 25, Box of Fireworks at Maxi Hypermarket
    Rybinsk, st. Furmanova 4, Box of Fireworks at Hypermarket Maxi in stock
    Vologda, st. Chernyshevsky 88, Box of Fireworks in the parking lot of Supermarket Maxi in stock
    Vologda, Poshekhonskoe sh. 22, a box of fireworks in the parking lot of the mall Marmelad available
    Vologda, st. Puteyskaya 1 A, Box of Fireworks available
    Vologda, Okruzhnoe sh. 12, a box of fireworks in the parking lot of the mall RIO available
    Balashikha, st.

    Tcl tvs rating: The 4 Best TCL TVs of 2023: Reviews and Smart Features

    Опубликовано: August 7, 2022 в 4:36 pm

    Автор:

    Категории: Miscellaneous

    The 4 Best TCL TVs of 2023: Reviews and Smart Features

    Updated Apr 05, 2023 at 04:18 pm

    By Adam Babcock

    We’ve bought and tested more than 15 TCL TVs. TCL TVs have shown to offer great value over the past few years, and although they aren’t as established in the United States as other brands, they’ve made a name for themselves. While they’re traditionally known for their basic models with limited features, some of their recent releases feature the latest technology, including Mini LED backlighting and variable refresh rate (VRR) support. They’re often available at a lower cost than competitors, and most people will be pleased with their higher-end models. They mainly compete with Hisense, but they release models to compete with brands like Sony and Samsung.

    Most brands have started releasing their 2023 lineups, so make sure to vote on which ones you want us to buy and test first. If you want to find out more about what TCL has planned for their 2023 lineup, check out our 2023 TV lineup page.

    Updates

    • 02/23/2023

      TCL 6 Series/R646 2021 QLED updated

    • 02/22/2023

      TCL 4 Series/S446 2021 updated

    • 02/13/2023

      TCL 5 Series/S546 2021 QLED updated

    • 11/24/2022

      TCL 6 Series/R655 2022 QLED reviewed

    • 11/23/2022

      TCL 5 Series/S555 2022 QLED reviewed

    Best TCL Smart TVs

    1. Best TCL TV

      TCL 6 Series/R655 2022 QLED

      Searching

      Finding Store

      Searching

      Finding Store

      Mixed Usage

      8. 5

      Movies

      8.7

      TV Shows

      8.2

      Sports

      8.1

      Video Games

      8.8

      HDR Movies

      8.6

      HDR Gaming

      8.7

      PC Monitor

      8.0

      Type

      LED

      Sub-Type

      VA

      Resolution

      4k

      Sizes
      55″ 65″ 75″ 85″

      See all our test results

      The best TCL TV we’ve tested is the TCL 6 Series/R655 2022 QLED. It’s an impressive TV that delivers great picture quality and has an impressive selection of extra features. It looks great in any room thanks to its high peak brightness, excellent reflection handling, and superb contrast. It features a Mini LED local dimming feature to improve the appearance of dark scenes, resulting in very little blooming around bright areas of otherwise dark scenes.

      It’s surprisingly well-equipped for the price. It supports HDMI 2.1 bandwidth on two of its ports, meaning you can take full advantage of 4k @ 120Hz gaming on the new-gen consoles, and unlike almost every other TV on the market, it has a maximum refresh rate of 144Hz, which is great for PC gamers. It also supports variable refresh rate technology, which helps reduce tearing in games. Like all TCL TVs running Roku TV, its smart features are limited. That said, it comes with the more recent Roku Voice remote, so you can search for content with your voice directly from the remote instead of using the companion app with most other TCL TVs.

      See our review

    2. Best Mid-Range TCL TV

      TCL 5 Series/S555 2022 QLED

      Searching

      Finding Store

      Searching

      Finding Store

      Mixed Usage

      7. 6

      TV Shows

      6.9

      Sports

      7.1

      Video Games

      8.1

      HDR Movies

      7.8

      HDR Gaming

      8.2

      PC Monitor

      8.1

      Type

      LED

      Sub-Type

      VA

      Resolution

      4k

      Sizes
      50″ 55″ 65″ 75″

      See all our test results

      If you want something cheaper than the TCL 6 Series/R655 2022 QLED, the best mid-range TCL TV we’ve tested is the TCL 5 Series/S555 2022 QLED. It’s a great TV that delivers similar picture quality to the more expensive 6 Series, but it’s not as well-equipped for gamers. It’s about as good as the 6 Series for watching movies in the dark, thanks to its superb contrast ratio and fantastic black uniformity. However, its local dimming feature isn’t quite as effective at making bright highlights stand out.

      It’s also a great gaming TV, but stepping down to the 5 Series limits its gaming power. It supports variable refresh rate technology to help reduce tearing, but it’s limited to a 60Hz refresh rate and doesn’t support HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. It has a very good response time, resulting in clear motion when gaming, and it’s still a good choice for next-gen gamers, especially if you prefer graphically intense games over fast-paced action.

      See our review

    3. Best Budget TCL TV

      TCL 4 Series/S455 2022

      Searching

      Finding Store

      Searching

      Finding Store

      Mixed Usage

      7. 6

      Movies

      8.7

      TV Shows

      6.9

      Sports

      6.7

      Video Games

      7.8

      HDR Movies

      7.7

      HDR Gaming

      7.9

      PC Monitor

      7.1

      Type

      LED

      Sub-Type

      VA

      Resolution

      4k

      Sizes
      43″ 50″ 55″ 58″ 65″ 75″ 85″

      See all our test results

      TCL’s 4 Series lineup is a budget-friendly lineup whose TVs don’t cost much. Like the 6 Series and 5 Series models, TCL has released them in the past few years with different smart platforms. The TCL 4 Series/S446 2021 is the current Google TV available, while the TCL 4 Series/S455 2022 is the latest Roku model and performs better than the S446, making it the best TCL TV you can get on a budget. The Roku platform is great, with an easy-to-use interface, and there are tons of apps you can download through the app store. The remote doesn’t have a mic built-in, but you can use the Roku app on your phone for voice control.

      Although it’s a basic TV and doesn’t have as many features as the TCL 5 Series/S555 2022 QLED, it’s still an okay TV that performs well for a low-cost model. It has a fantastic native contrast ratio that results in deep blacks and has remarkable black uniformity with minimal blooming. It doesn’t have any upscaling issues, and it has okay out-of-the-box accuracy. There are some drawbacks, as it doesn’t get bright enough to fight glare, but it has decent reflection handling if you have a lamp in your room.

      See our review

    4. Best Cheap TCL TV

      TCL 40S325

      Searching

      Finding Store

      Searching

      Finding Store

      Mixed Usage

      5.9

      Movies

      5.7

      TV Shows

      6.6

      Sports

      6.8

      Video Games

      6.3

      HDR Movies

      4.5

      HDR Gaming

      4.1

      PC Monitor

      6. 8

      Type

      LED

      Sub-Type

      VA

      Resolution

      1080p (except 32″)

      See all our test results

      TCL is one of the few big brands left that still makes cheap 1080p and 720p TVs in smaller sizes. These types of TVs are great for kitchens or bedrooms as they come with a smart system built in, and you can easily stream your favorite shows without needing an external device. If that’s something you’re looking for, the TCL 40S325 is a good choice. Although it’s a 2019 model, you can still find it available, and it’s a cheap TV that isn’t bad overall. It has a 1080p resolution, so while you can’t watch content in 4k, you can still get a sharp 1080p image. The built-in Roku smart platform has fewer features than higher-end models and feels slower, but it still has all the same great apps.

      If you’re getting a cheap TV like this one, there are a few compromises you have to make. It doesn’t perform well in a bright room as it has low peak brightness, but it has good reflection handling and displays deep blacks if you want to use it in a moderately-lit or dark room. It also doesn’t support HDR, but that’s normal for a 1080p TV. Luckily, it has excellent out-of-the-box accuracy, which is important, as you can’t calibrate it.

      See our review

    Compared to other brands

    • Inexpensive.
      TCL is one of the more budget-friendly brands on the market, and their TVs offer great value for their cost.
    • Great smart OS.
      TCL TVs either use Roku or Google TV smart platforms, which are user-friendly and have many apps you can download.
    • Starting to include extra features.
      As of their 2021 lineup, TCL started to include extra gaming features like HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and VRR support on their higher-end models.
    • Low peak brightness.
      Besides the premium models, most TCL TVs we’ve tested have low brightness measurements.
    • Not very polished.
      TCL TVs aren’t as polished as other brands, as there are often issues with upscaling and local dimming.
    • Not good for wide seating areas.
      Except for a few entry-level models, their TVs usually have VA panels with narrow viewing angles, so they’re not good if you have a wide seating arrangement.

    TCL vs Hisense

    Hisense and TCL are direct competitors in the budget TV market. Their TVs usually offer the same features and similar performance, although some TCL TVs don’t get as bright. They each have flaws, as TCL tends to have picture quality issues, while Hisense has motion problems.

    TCL vs Vizio

    Vizio and TCL aim to produce TVs in the budget market, although Vizio makes a few more high-end models. Vizio TVs tend to have better dark room performance and more gaming features, but the Roku platform on the TCLs is much better and easier to use than the Vizio SmartCast system.

    Overall, TCL TVs offer good picture quality and great features at a low price. Although some models aren’t as feature-packed or as well-built as more expensive options, their TVs typically offer great value compared to similarly-priced options. If you need a simple TV with a good smart system, you’ll be happy with most of their offerings.

    Lineup

    TCL’s lineup in the United States is usually smaller than other brands, and unlike other companies, their models are available for a few years. TCL is one of the few brands to announce a good mix of premium, high-end TVs and smaller budget models for their 2023 lineup. Their lineup is split in two this year, and they’ve changed their naming scheme to make it easier to differentiate between their entry-level models and their high-end models with Quantum Dot technology. They’re advertising their flagship QM8 series to have an impressive Mini LED backlight with over 2300 local dimming zones. Like LG, TCL has abandoned 8k TVs at this point, with no new 8k models announced for 2023. Interestingly, TCL originally announced that their QD-OLED TV, which was originally announced for 2022, would finally be available towards the end of this year. They’ve since adjusted their press release, removing all mention of the QD-OLED TV, so it’s now unclear if or when that TV will come out.

    Learn more about the 2023 TCL lineup here.

    TCL Smart Features

    While the majority of TCL’s TVs use Roku, there are a few from 2021 that use Google TV. They’re both great smart platforms, and choosing one of the other comes down to personal preference. Generally speaking, Roku is easier to learn and feels quicker than Google TV, but Google is more customizable, and the Google Play Store has even more apps.

    Interface

    Roku’s interface is very basic, with simple graphics and limited animations. It results in a very easy-to-use, fast interface that’s relatively bug-free. It’s also one of the few smart interfaces that support themes, meaning you can customize it a bit.

    As for Google TV, it consists of multiple rows that you can customize to include which apps you see first and which apps you don’t want to see. It’s great if you’re already used to it, but it can feel overwhelming if you aren’t, so it takes a bit of time to learn.

    Ad-free

    Unfortunately, both Roku and Google TV have large, intrusive ads in the main home menu and throughout the interface, and it’s impossible to disable them completely.

    Apps & Features

    TCL TVs use a mix of Roku OS and Google TV, so the app store and channel lineup vary depending on which model you get. Roku-powered TVs give you access to the Roku Channel Store, and it offers a good selection of streaming channels.

    Android and Google TV-powered TCL TVs both give you access to the Google Play Store, and if you’ve ever used an Android-powered phone, you’ll find many of the same apps available. It’s also easy to sideload unofficially supported apps on Google TV, so overall, the platform offers the widest selection of streaming apps available on any smart TV.

    Voice Controls

    Some TCL TVs support voice controls, either from the advanced remote or the remote app, but they only support basic commands. You can launch certain apps through voice control and search across multiple apps for content. Unlike some TVs, you can’t control the TV’s settings through voice controls.

    This is where Google TV has an advantage because the remote supports voice control, and it’s also compatible with other Google devices, so you can easily open apps and stream your favorite shows. Some of TCL’s Google models even have a mic built into the TV.

    Remote

    The Roku TVs come with a small remote, which isn’t a bad thing since it’s very comfortable and responsive. The TCL branding is impressively minimal, and much like the interface, it’s a carbon copy of the ones you can find with the Roku boxes.

    There are different versions of the remote, and the differences are usually with the features. Some have better wireless capabilities, so you don’t need to point directly at the TV for it to work. Usually, the higher-end models come with a built-in mic on the remote.

    TCL’s version of the Google remote is similar as it has quick-access buttons and a circular pad for navigation.

    Remote App

    One of the best features of the Roku platform is its remote app you can find on both iOS and Android. It can do everything the smart remote can and more, so it’s fully featured. All the basic remote controls are available, even powering the TV on and off. You can plug in headphones to your device and listen to the TV privately through the app. Lastly, the app also allows you to access settings that aren’t available on the TV, like the calibration settings. Roku is better than Google TV in this regard, mainly because Google TVs let you do everything you need to by just using the remote.

    Recent Updates

    1. Apr 05, 2023:
      Verified our picks for availability and consistency, and refreshed the text throughout. Updated the lineup information with the 2023 lineup.

    2. Nov 30, 2022:
      Replaced the TCL 6 Series/R646 2021 QLED with the TCL 6 Series/R655 2022 QLED, and the TCL 5 Series/S546 2021 QLED with the TCL 5 Series/S555 2022 QLED.

    3. Aug 29, 2022:
      Updated structure to cover more of TCL’s lineup; renamed the TCL 5 Series/S546 as ‘Best Mid-Range’ and replaced the TCL S435 with the TCL S446 in the budget category because it’s easier to find. Added the TCL 3 Series as the ‘Best Cheap TV’, added a Lineup section, and updated the Smart Features section to talk about Google TV.

    4. Mar 04, 2022:
      Replaced the TCL 5 Series/S535 2020 with the newer TCL 5 Series/S546 2021 because it has more features; updated the Smart Features section to be consistent with the current Roku platform.

    5. Nov 04, 2021:
      Replaced the TCL 6 Series/R635 2020 QLED with the TCL 6 Series/R646 2021 QLED, as the newer model is much better overall for about the same price.

    Conclusion

    TCL’s lineup is mostly budget-oriented, and they do very well in that area. Their smart platforms rival the very best, and TCL offers different smart platforms, which isn’t something other brands do. Plus, their picture quality has been consistently good across their models. Overall, it’s tough to beat them when it comes to budget TVs, and that makes them a pretty safe bet, but if you want a premium TV, you can find more options with other brands.

    Test results

    TCL TV Reviews | PCMag

    PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

    Related Categories

    All Home Entertainment
    Home Entertainment Accessories
    Blu-ray Players
    Media Streaming Devices
    Universal Remotes

    Popular TV Brands

    All TVs
    Amazon
    Hisense
    LG
    Samsung
    Sony
    VIZIO

    Latest TCL TV Reviews

    TCL introduces mini-LED backlighting to its already-excellent 6-Series 4K Roku TV, bringing it in line with top-notch Google TV competitors.

    $949.99

    at Best Buy

    (Opens in a new window)

    9/30/2022
    By
    Will Greenwald

    TCL introduces mini-LED backlighting to its already-excellent 6-Series 4K Roku TV, bringing it in line with top-notch Google TV competitors.

    $649.99

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    9/26/2022
    By
    Will Greenwald

    TCL introduces mini-LED backlighting to its already-excellent 6-Series 4K Roku TV, bringing it in line with top-notch Google TV competitors.

    $1,274.99

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    9/26/2022
    By
    Will Greenwald

    4.5

    Editors’ Choice

    The TCL 4K 6-Series with Google TV offers more features and better performance than the Roku-based 6-Series, and all you’re giving up is Apple AirPlay.

    $1,169.99

    at Best Buy

    (Opens in a new window)

    12/13/2021
    By
    Will Greenwald

    4.5

    Editors’ Choice

    The TCL 4K 6-Series with Google TV offers more features and better performance than the Roku-based 6-Series, and all you’re giving up is Apple AirPlay.

    $579.99

    at Best Buy

    (Opens in a new window)

    12/13/2021
    By
    Will Greenwald

    4.5

    Editors’ Choice

    The TCL 4K 6-Series with Google TV offers more features and better performance than the Roku-based 6-Series, and all you’re giving up is Apple AirPlay.

    $549.99

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    12/13/2021
    By
    Will Greenwald

    TCL’s 6-Series of 8K TVs offer an excellent picture with impressive contrast and wide colors for a more affordable price than we’ve seen on other 8K models, though there still isn’t any content to really take advantage of it.

    $1,899.99

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    8/13/2021
    By
    Will Greenwald

    TCL’s 6-Series of 8K TVs offer an excellent picture with impressive contrast and wide colors for a more affordable price than we’ve seen on other 8K models, though there still isn’t any content to really take advantage of it.

    $3,477.93

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    8/06/2021
    By
    Will Greenwald

    The TCL 4-Series line of TVs offers modest picture quality and Roku functionality at a rock-bottom price.

    $311.00

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    3/09/2021
    By
    Will Greenwald

    The TCL 4-Series line of TVs offers modest picture quality and Roku functionality at a rock-bottom price.

    $373.75

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    3/02/2021
    By
    Will Greenwald

    The TCL 4-Series line of TVs offers modest picture quality and Roku functionality at a rock-bottom price.

    $431.46

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    3/02/2021
    By
    Will Greenwald

    The TCL 4-Series line of TVs offers modest picture quality and Roku functionality at a rock-bottom price.

    $631.99

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    3/02/2021
    By
    Will Greenwald

    The TCL 6-Series of TVs for 2020 offers the best picture for the line yet, with fantastic color and contrast for a reasonable price.

    $833.95

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    10/08/2020
    By
    Will Greenwald

    The TCL 6-Series of TVs for 2020 offers the best picture for the line yet, with fantastic color and contrast for a reasonable price.

    $898.00

    at Walmart

    (Opens in a new window)

    10/01/2020
    By
    Will Greenwald

    The TCL 6-Series of TVs for 2020 offers the best picture for the line yet, with fantastic color and contrast for a reasonable price.

    $1,848.39

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    10/01/2020
    By
    Will Greenwald

    The TCL 8-Series of 4K LED TVs features a bright picture with vibrant color, at a price just a bit lower than comparable flagship models.

    $1,499.99

    at Best Buy

    (Opens in a new window)

    12/03/2019
    By
    Will Greenwald

    The TCL 8-Series of 4K LED TVs features a bright picture with vibrant color, at a price just a bit lower than comparable flagship models.

    $1,429.99

    at Best Buy

    (Opens in a new window)

    11/26/2019
    By
    Will Greenwald

    The 2019 TCL 6-series of TVs offer a bright, colorful picture for a very reasonable price, with lots of streaming options thanks to Roku TV.

    $952.65

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    11/08/2019
    By
    Will Greenwald

    The 2019 TCL 6-series of TVs offer a bright, colorful picture for a very reasonable price, with lots of streaming options thanks to Roku TV.

    $1,199.00

    at Amazon

    (Opens in a new window)

    11/01/2019
    By
    Will Greenwald

    Advertisement

    Best TCL TVs of 2023.

    TVs belong to the middle price category. The main reason for the entry of high-quality modern TVs into this part of the market is that components exclusively of their own production are used for assembly.

    In our rating – the best TCL TVs according to customer and expert reviews.

    1. TV TCL 43P637
    • Key Features
    • Type: LCD
    • Diagonal: 43
    • Screen Format: 16:9
    • Resolution: 3840×2160
    • HD resolution: 4K UHD
    • HDR formats: HDR10, HLG
    • Screen Technology: HDR, LED
    • Total Sound Power: 20W
    • Smart TV: Yes
    • Smart TV Platform: 9 0015 Google TV
    • Screen refresh rate: 60 Hz
    • Model year: 2022

    4. 7 Average rating

    TCL 43P637

    The optimal model of the updated series of budget smart TVs with adequate hardware and a bunch of useful chips.

    Picture

    4.7

    Sound

    4.6

    Control

    4.6

    Appearance

    4.9 9 0003

    Functionality

    4.9

    Positive

    • Price and Smart TV

    Negatives

    • Long first launch.
    • Key Features
    • Type: LCD
    • Diagonal: 50
    • Screen Format: 9001 5 16:9
    • Resolution: 3840×2160
    • HD resolution: 4K UHD
    • HDR formats: HDR10+, Dolby Vision
    • Screen technology: QLED, HDR
    • Total Sound Power: 20W
    • Smart TV: Yes
    • Smart TV Platform: Google TV
    • Screen Refresh Rate: 60Hz 9 0010
    • Model year: 2022

    4. 8 Average rating

    TCL 50C635

    The TCL C635 is a 4K TV that delivers incredible picture quality and superior sound with Quantum Dot technology and ONKYO sound system. It definitely lives up to everything you would expect from a great TV. And the decisive factor here is the very simple, fast and convenient user interface of the Google TV system. Now wake up your personalized Google TV C635 with a simple “OK Google!” and start your amazing smart TV journey.

    Picture

    4.9

    Sound

    4.6

    Ease of use

    4.8

    Appearance

    4.9 90 003

    Functionality

    4.9

    Positive

    • Normal mounting for a 30×30 bracket, this is rare.
    • High quality picture.

    Negatives

    • Not very thin.
    • Key features
    • Type: LCD TV
    • Diagonal: 55
    • Aspect Ratio: 16:9
    • Resolution: 3840×2160
    • 9000 7 HDR formats: Dolby Vision, HDR10+

    • Backlight type: Direct LED
    • Screen Technology: HDR, QLED
    • Smart TV: Yes
    • Smart TV Platform: Google TV
    • Model Year: 2 022

    4. 7Average

    TCL 55C635

    4K TV delivering incredible picture quality and superior sound with Quantum Dot technology and ONKYO sound system. It definitely lives up to everything you would expect from a great TV. And the decisive factor here is the very simple, fast and convenient user interface of the Google TV system.

    Picture

    4.7

    Sound

    4.7

    Control

    4.5

    Appearance

    4.9

    Functionality

    4.7

    Positive

    • Value for money.
    • No glare, juicy picture for its price range.
    • When an Xbox is connected, game mode is automatically enabled at 120Hz.

    Negatives

    • Google TV out of the box is overloaded with unnecessary applications in the Russian Federation.
    • Sometimes there is a marriage, the screen does not even have a film.
    • Key Features
    • Type: LCD TV
    • Size: 50
    • Screen Format: 1 6:9
    • Resolution: 3840×2160, 3840×2160 4K
    • HDR formats: HDR10, HLG
    • Backlight type: Direct LED
    • Screen technology: HDR, LED
    • Smart TV: yes
    • 90 014 Smart TV platform: Google TV
    • Model Year: 2022

    4. 7Average Grade

    TCL 50P637

    and the range of tones, brightness and contrast are significantly improved for every frame. More detailed content makes your browsing experience interesting and enjoyable. High dynamic range (HDR) images is an Ultra HD standard that will bring you incredible enjoyment with extraordinary brightness, rich shadow detail and vivid colors. Sit back and enjoy the smallest details of the picture exactly as the filmmakers intended it.
    TCL’s exclusive Dynamic Color Enhancement is specifically designed to automatically optimize color brightness. Proprietary algorithm pushes the traditional boundaries of the color palette, delivering a vibrant and enhanced video viewing experience.

    Picture

    4.8

    Sound

    4.7

    Ease of use

    4.6

    Appearance

    4.9 90 003

    Functionality

    4.7

    Positive

    • Price/quality
    • Under ps4.
    • 4k screen.
    • 50 in.

    Negatives

    • There is no way to set up via Google home, since the application in Russia is no longer available for iOS.
    • Key Features
    • Type: LCD TV
    • Diagonal: 65
    • Screen Format: 16:9 90 010
    • Resolution: 3840×2160
    • HD resolution: 4K UHD
    • Backlight Type: Direct LED
    • Sound Features: Dolby Audio, Stereo Sound
    • Smart TV Platform: Android
    • Screen Refresh Rate: 60Hz
    • Model Year: 2022

    4.7Average

    TCL 65P637

    60 Hz. This TV is equipped with LED technology and offers a brightness of 270 cd/m². Interfaces and connectors for connecting to this TV include AV-in, Ethernet – RJ-45, USB Type-A, three HDMI inputs, a headphone output and a CI slot. Wireless features include Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. TCL 65P637 uses the Google Smart TV platform. The screen resolution is 3840×2160 pixels, it corresponds to the Direct LED backlight type. The TV supports HDR formats such as HDR10 and HLG for better and brighter picture quality. The audio system of this model has a power of 20 W, which provides a clear and balanced sound for watching movies and series.

    Picture

    4.8

    Sound

    4.5

    Ease of use

    4.5

    Appearance

    5 9000 3

    Functionality

    4.6

    Positive

    • Bright display
    • Excellent price-performance ratio
    • Not bad color rendition, no glare or dead pixels
    • Good black color (at brightness above 75%)
    • No problems with image freezing and slowdown
    • Securely packaged when ordered from OGO
    • Bright enough for a room
    • Clear sound at normal volume

    Negatives

    • Weak Wi-Fi signal
    • Black fades to purple at maximum brightness
    • Sometimes slows down the interface, requires uninstall unnecessary apps
    • No built-in speed impact control
    • Medium sound, no bass
    • Google TV and Google Home country restrictions
    • The sound at maximum volume is worse, although at normal volume the sound is clear, but not deep. It was founded in 1981, and the famous brand entered the world market only at the end of the 20th century. But due to the good value for money, the company quickly gained popularity. The company demonstrated particularly rapid growth in the Russian market. Therefore, part of the production of TCL moved to the Russian Federation. It is here, at the Telebalt factory, that budget models and TVs of the middle price segment are assembled. Matrices, at the same time, are made in China, which allows us to guarantee the high quality of work of both enterprises. We have collected the most interesting devices of the Chinese giant in our ranking of the best TCL TVs.

      Contents:

      • TOP 7 best TVs TCL
      • 21 LED
      • 4. TCL 55P615 LED
      • 5. TCL 43P617 LED
      • 6. TCL LED40D3000
      • 7. TCL L32S60A
      • Which TCL TV is better

      TOP 7 best TCL TVs

      The statistics speaks most clearly about the manufacturer’s success and trust in the TCL brand. The company ranks second in the world in terms of sales. The company owns 22 production bases, as well as 28 research laboratories. Among them, 10 are collaborating with other popular companies, which allows you to quickly introduce modern technologies into LCD TVs. TCL’s achievements have been repeatedly recognized with IFA awards for technical innovation in the field of imaging. The company has also received iF and Red Dot design awards. EISA has named TCL TVs the perfect buy for several years in a row. It is worth remembering about more than 160 representative offices around the world, including the Russian Federation.

      1. TCL 65P728 2021 LED

      Popular 4K TV based on CSOT VA panel. The panel has an honest bit depth of 8 bits, but thanks to the use of FRC, the technique can display over a billion unique shades. The TV supports the latest HDR10 and Dolby Vision standards, as well as MEMC technology, which ensures even fast-moving images are smoother and more detailed.

      The TCL TV is well calibrated, with a peak brightness of 330 cd/m2 and a contrast ratio of 5000:1. The sound in the reviewed model is also in full order. Two speakers with a combined output of 20W sound loud and clear, while Dolby Atmos support delivers even more immersive sound with more spaciousness. The AiPQ processor with AI SR intelligent algorithm is responsible for processing the picture and sound in the 65P728 UHD TV.

      Advantages:

      • good image quality;
      • picture customization;
      • quick start TV function;
      • integrated Google Assistant;
      • handles “heavy” videos;
      • handy complete remote control.

      Disadvantages:

      • MEMC operation is not always correct.

      2. TCL 65P617 LED

      Another large-diameter model continues the rating of the best TCL TVs. Like other models of the manufacturer in this price segment, the TV is based on a VA panel. The contrast here is 4000:1. This is slightly lower than in older versions, but still enough to display deep blacks. The 4K resolution screen is enhanced with technologies that can significantly improve the picture quality.

      First, Dynamic Color Enhancement is applied here. This technology was developed by TCL engineers and allows you to automatically control the color brightness. The algorithm allows you to cut off dull shades and enhance saturated ones. The Micro Dimming function with 1296 dimming zones provides full support for HDR content. The TV also features smart upscaling of Full HD and Quad HD content to 4K UHD resolution.

      Pros:

      • thousands of apps in the Google Play Store;
      • local dimming and HDR support;
      • quick search via Google Assistant;
      • amazing sound with Dolby Audio;
      • good value for money.

      Disadvantages:

      • turns on slowly.

      3.

      TCL 55P728 2021 LED

      Maximum functionality for an affordable price. That is what a good 55P728 TV offers. Inside the device uses a fast hardware platform with 16 GB of permanent and 2 GB of RAM. This is enough for fast operation of all popular applications. By the way, there are quite a few of them here, because the Android OS is installed on the TV. It allows you to install not only programs from the Play Market, but also unofficial software.

      Third party software, installed via APK files. This feature is useful when you need alternative clients for existing programs or you want to access free cinemas to watch movies.

      The Smart TV on this TV also supports Google Voice Assistant. It will help you quickly find the desired series, find out the weather forecast and even control the device without using the remote control. To do this, the TV uses Hands-Free Voice Control 2.0 technology. Switch channels and open settings with your voice, as well as control other appliances in the apartment connected to the smart home system and control lighting.

      Advantages:

      • functional system;
      • quality speakers;
      • attractive price tag;
      • good brightness;
      • build quality and appearance;
      • voice control without remote control;
      • 2-band Wi-Fi module.

      Weaknesses:

      • sometimes the OS is a little thoughtful.

      4. TCL 55P615 LED

      The following model is a low cost TV in the 4K UHD category. VA-matrix 55P615 is capable of displaying a billion colors. This allows you to get high detail and a smooth transition between different parts of the frame. To ensure that the picture always looks great, TCL uses Tone Mapping technology to convert the brightness and optimize the image. The 55P615 also has a proprietary algorithm that intensifies colors and evens out contrast. In terms of speed, this model is one of the best TVs of the TCL brand in terms of price-performance ratio. The system is stable, and a large selection of applications significantly expands the functionality of the device.

      Advantages:

      • scaling technology;
      • keypad with quick access buttons;
      • convenient voice assistant;
      • works with smart home gadgets;
      • price-performance ratio;
      • Bluetooth version 5.0 and Wi-Fi 5 GHz.

      Disadvantages:

      • built-in player is not very convenient.

      5. TCL 43P617 LED

      The newest Android operating system brings amazing user experience. Watch movies and series, listen to music and find the information you need with just a few clicks. And if you do not want to control a high-quality TV with a small diagonal using a remote control or a smartphone, then the Google Assistant will help you perform the same operations with your voice, even without a remote control.

      The phone control function is implemented through the proprietary TCL MagiConnect application. The program is available for gadgets based on Android and iOS and allows you not only to replace the remote control, but also to take screenshots of TV programs, broadcast content from a smartphone, and perform text search through a virtual keyboard.

      Another reason to buy the 43P617 is the sound quality. Two speakers with a total power of 19 watts are responsible for it. Declared support for Dolby Audio and a number of other technologies aimed at improving sound. Also, the TV is compatible with Intelligent TCL and Google Home, which are needed to interact with smart home technology. Change the lighting, turn on the vacuum cleaner and other devices using voice commands.

      Advantages:

      • reads all popular formats;
      • good system performance;
      • sound and color quality;
      • solid assembly;
      • telephone control support;
      • one of the best for its price.

      Disadvantages:

      • only one USB connector.

      6. TCL LED40D3000

      If Full HD resolution is enough for you, then the LED40D3000 TV is the best option to purchase. This is the only model in our review that comes without an OS. On the one hand, the functionality of the technique is limited because of this. On the other hand, if necessary, you can buy a suitable set-top box based on Android TV.
      The sound in this budget TV is very good according to reviews. The speakers with a total power of 16 W are responsible for it, which is just fine for such a diagonal. The screen has good color rendering, contrast ratio as much as 5000:1, which guarantees deep blacks, brightness up to 250 cd/m2, which is not very high. Among the connectors there is a pair of HDMI and only one USB port.

      Advantages:

      • good color rendering;
      • high sound quality;
      • reasonable price;
      • thin bezel;
      • convenient control panel;
      • uniform illumination.

      Disadvantages:

      • lack of OS will not suit everyone.

      7. TCL L32S60A

      Looking for a cheap TV for your kitchen or small room? Model L32S60A is ideal for these requirements. This is a compact and stylish technique with a frameless VA screen. The display resolution is only HD, but it allows the system to work faster. The OS here, by the way, is Android, so the owner will have access to all functions, including software from alternative sources. The quality of the calibration is very good, HDR support is nominally available, but with a brightness of 220 cd / m2 and a small number of local dimming zones, you are unlikely to notice significant differences. For sports fans, the TV has a dedicated Sports Mode, and Smart Volume automatically equalizes the sound to eliminate sudden fluctuations when changing channels and transitioning between scenes.

      Advantages:

      • voice search function;
      • large selection of applications;
      • Google Chromecast support;
      • Wi-Fi and Bluetooth stability;
      • very attractive design.

      Disadvantages:

      • weak speakers and viewing angles.

    Wi fi adapter pc: The Best USB Wi-Fi Adapters for 2023

    Опубликовано: August 6, 2022 в 4:36 pm

    Автор:

    Категории: Miscellaneous

    The Best USB Wi-Fi Adapters for 2023

    Good Wi-Fi is a modern necessity, especially for homes where multiple people are trying to work, learn, or be entertained. As you carve out odd spaces for home offices, you may end up in weird corners of kitchens, attics, or basements where your Wi-Fi doesn’t reach. I live in a pretty small apartment, but two thick, 1928-era walls separate my home office from my Wi-Fi router. The router itself is perfectly adequate for the space; my computer’s Wi-Fi antenna is what falls short.

    The best way to improve your Wi-Fi signal is to switch from a single router to a mesh network system, but mesh systems can be expensive. Wi-Fi extenders are another option, even though they can create interference and add latency; I wasn’t thrilled when I tried one. If you just need to eke a little bit more Wi-Fi out to one laptop or desktop, a USB adapter is a much cheaper alternative.

    These adapters work on a simple principle: If you improve your antenna, your signal will improve too. In 2021, we purchased three adapters from TP-Link, one from Netgear, and two random low-cost Amazon brands. We tested those models in four locations: right next to my router; in my home office, only a few feet away but through two walls; by my building elevator, which is another 20 feet away and through another wall; and on the next floor up. Recently, we purchased the first available Wi-Fi 6 adapter and tested it against some of the best-performing models from the earlier bunch.

    All of these adapters are compatible with Windows PCs and several also work with Linux. None of them have official drivers for macOS versions later than 10.15 (and some don’t even have that), because the chipset vendors don’t bother to support macOS. An enterprising independent programmer has developed macOS 11 and macOS 12 drivers(Opens in a new window) for many of the adapters we’ve reviewed, but you should yse these at your own risk. Adapters also likely won’t work with other home electronics, as they require the right drivers.

    The 802.11ac Wi-Fi spec is disturbingly complicated, with more than a dozen different performance levels referred to by AC and a number. The adapters we found perform at the AC1200, AC1300, and AC1900 levels. Here’s how all of those AC numbers in that range translate into potential speeds on the two main Wi-Fi frequency bands: 2.4GHz and 5GHz. If this chart makes your head hurt, just remember that higher numbers are better.


    Wi-Fi 6 USB Adapters

    Wi-Fi 6 promises to bring better speeds, better range, and less interference to business and home networks, but so far, that experience hasn’t materialized in real-world environments.

    Since the first one launched last summer, a few other Wi-Fi 6 USB sticks are now available, including the Asus USB-AX56, the D-Link DWA-X1850, and several shifty-looking Amazon brands. We reviewed the first model to hit the market, D-Link’s DWA-X1850. All of the current adapters use the AX1800 version of the Wi-Fi 6 spec, so they aren’t inherently faster than the best 802. 11ac adapters we tested. In our full review of the X1850, we found that while it showed better signal strength than the Wi-Fi 5 adapters on a 2.4GHz network in a weak signal situation, that characteristic didn’t at all translate into actual speed or reliability improvements in other situations.

    All the other adapters we tested support Wi-Fi 5, or 802.11ac. Your laptop probably supports 802.11ac—most laptops released since 2013 do—but if yours doesn’t, that’s another reason to get an adapter. 802.11ac is a massive improvement over the previous 802.11n and can give you a boost even without the benefits of the bigger antenna on an adapter.

    No, there are no Wi-Fi 6E USB adapters yet.


    The D-Link DWA-X1850 was the first Wi-Fi 6 adapter on the market
    (Credit: Sascha Segan)


    Testing Wi-Fi Adapters

    Of the adapters we’ve tested, our pick is the TP-Link Archer T9UH. For the price, this AC1900 adapter strikes the best balance between cost and signal-boosting. The Netgear Nighthawk adapter is even more powerful, but costs more. The other adapters are cheaper but didn’t improve the connection as significantly in testing.


    The Archer T9UH works both as a docked adapter and as a plug-in dongle
    (Credit: Sascha Segan)

    I tested Wi-Fi 5 performance with a 500Mbps symmetrical Verizon Fios fiber connection using a Verizon Fios G1100, an AC1750 router. When I tested the Wi-Fi 5 adapters against each other earlier in 2021, my whole family was working and learning from home. Top speeds were unreliable because congestion kept changing. So, I focused on the signal strength and the speed loss when moving the laptop quickly from one location to another.

    When I tested the D-Link Wi-Fi 6 adapter more recently, I could do so in a more controlled environment. As such, I was able to compare speeds between that adapter, the TP-Link Archer T9UH, and the TP-Link Archer T4U Plus. Those results are in the full D-Link DWA-X1850 review.

    In terms of pure signal improvement, the more expensive adapters with better specs performed better. The below chart shows how each Wi-Fi 5 adapter affected pure 5GHz signal strength on my laptop, averaged over the four locations I tested it.

    Of course, what you should most care about is the data download speed you’ll get in places where you were previously having Wi-Fi trouble. In my tests, those two locations were in my office (bad speeds) and by the elevator (really bad speeds). The chart below shows how each adapter affected speeds in those two locations, relative to the speeds I got right by the router. The Y-axis is flipped, so a higher point indicates better performance and less speed lost.

    Here are the detailed breakdowns of each antenna’s pros and cons:


    TP-Link Archer T9UH

    $44.99 at Amazon

    See It
    (Opens in a new window)

    The Archer T9UH, an AC1900 dongle, had the best overall speed performance of any of the adapters I tested, making my home office wall seem nearly transparent to signal. The T9UH is 0.5 inch thick and 3.5 inches long when closed; it flips open to a height of about 6 inches. You can plug it directly into your laptop or use an included USB 3.0 cradle. The dongle has a small blue LED to show it’s working.

    And work it does. Over my 5GHz 802.11ac network, I saw an average signal improvement of 11dB at my four locations, as well as the lowest overall speed loss. At one point, I was getting a higher speed in my office than right next to the router, which was probably because of how other people in the house were using the internet. Still, this performance shows that the T9UH can really reach through the wall. The dongle didn’t do well with my router’s 2.4GHz network and refused to connect to that network from farther than a few feet away, but you shouldn’t be using a 2.4GHz network with an adapter like this. It’s really for boosting 5GHz signal and does that very impressively. the T9UH is our Editors’ Choice winner out of the adapters we tested.

    D-Link DWA-X1850 Wi-Fi 6 USB Adapter

    $59. 99 at D-Link

    See It
    (Opens in a new window)

    The first Wi-Fi 6 USB adapter extends 2.4GHz range, but doesn’t deliver breakthrough peak speeds. When we tested the D-Link AX1850 with a Wi-Fi 6 router and measured its signal strength, it offers some theoretical advantages over the Wi-Fi 5 sticks. But perhaps because this is an AX1800 device—slightly slower than the competing AC1900 units—those advantages didn’t translate into faster speed at a distance.

    D-Link DWA-X1850 Wi-Fi 6 USB Adapter Review

    Netgear Nighthawk AC1900 Wi-Fi USB Adapter

    $59.95 at Amazon

    See It
    (Opens in a new window)

    Netgear’s big, solid AC1900 adapter performs well, but it costs too much for the performance you get. This is a chunky monkey. Folded shut, it’s 0.75 inch thick, 4 inches long, and unfurls to 7.5 inches. It’s too thick to plug directly into some thin-and-light laptops. Fortunately, it has a sturdy USB dock that’s magnetic, so you can just stick it on a nearby surface (not on many laptops, however).

    Like the Archer T9UH, the Nighthawk performed very well on my 5GHz 802.11ac network. However, it didn’t function well in its 2.4GHz 802.11n mode; the adapter simply wouldn’t find my router’s 2.4GHz network variant when it was on the other side of a wall from the router. It had the biggest average 5GHz boost of all—13dB—but the T9UH performed a bit better on speed loss.

    Ultimately, I don’t see a reason to get this instead of the T9UH. It’s nearly twice as expensive and, although it offers good performance, the T9UH is still very competitive.

    TP-Link Archer T3U Plus

    $19.99 at Amazon

    See It
    (Opens in a new window)

    TP-Link’s most basic adapter is a small USB dongle with a 7-inch rotatable antenna sticking out of it. Plug it in and macOS or Windows will automatically detect it. It is the purest, simplest example of “stick a big antenna on something and see what happens.”

    This is an AC1300 adapter and allows for two data streams on either 2.4GHz or 5GHz. It offered a small but noticeable signal boost in my home office, but not much of a noticeable change in terms of signal loss out by the elevator. It didn’t do any harm but didn’t improve much either.

    TP-Link Archer T4U Plus

    $23.99 at Amazon

    See It
    (Opens in a new window)

    The Archer T4U Plus sits at the sweet spot of price and performance. This adapter doesn’t plug directly into your PC; it’s a trapezoidal dongle with two six-inch antennas. Plug it in with the included USB cable and you’re good to go. The T4U Plus uses the AC1300 standard.

    The T4U Plus reliably connected to both my 5GHz and 2.4GHz networks, giving me a decent average signal improvement of 6.5dB on the 5GHz network. That translated into considerably better Wi-Fi performance in my office and out by the elevator than the laptop alone achieved. The improvement was noticeable—at the elevator, speed loss declined from 95% with just the laptop to 69% with the T4U. In terms of squeezing out more Wi-Fi speed for relatively little money, the T4U Plus does the trick.

    BrosTrend 1200Mbps Long Range USB WiFi Adapter

    $33.99 at Amazon

    See It
    (Opens in a new window)

    This off-brand adapter is shoddily made and generic. It’s an AC1200 adapter with two rotatable antennas. You can plug it directly into your PC or use the included dock. However, the USB dongle doesn’t plug all the way into its dock, leaving some of the connector exposed. The cable is supposed to route out of a notch in the bottom of the dock, but it tends to pop out of the notch and make the dock wobble.

    Performance-wise, the BrosTrend adapter did worse than I expected from something with two large antennas. On average, it got a 5.75dB better signal at 5GHz than the laptop alone, which was better than the Archer T3U but worse than the other TP-Link and Netgear adapters. It also lost more connection speed than any of the TP-Link or Netgear adapters, though it still performed better than the laptop alone. If you buy this adapter, you might think it’s good, but that’s just because you haven’t tried anything better.


    More Ways to Improve Your Wireless Connectivity


    (Image: T.Dallas/Shutterstock)

    If you suspect your Wi-Fi issues go deeper, here are 12 ways to troubleshoot your home internet connection. And if you’re also having trouble with your cell signal at home, we tested the best cell phone signal boosters, too.

    The Best USB Wi-Fi Adapters

    We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn more›

    1. Electronics
    2. Networking

    Photo: Rozette Rago

    FYI

    We’ve tested two new Wi-Fi 6 adapters, including the Asus USB-AX56 and D-Link DWA-X1850. Both performed adequately, but our current picks stand, even for homes with Wi-Fi 6 routers.

    Plugging in a USB adapter is one of the easiest ways to add 802.11ac Wi-Fi access to a desktop PC, especially if you don’t want to (or are unable to) install an internal card yourself. After 50 hours of testing 20 models against a high-end laptop’s internal Wi-Fi, we are confident the TP-Link Archer T4U is the best USB Wi-Fi adapter for most people.

    Our pick

    TP-Link Archer T4U V3

    The Archer T4U has better performance than the internal Wi-Fi adapter built into our test laptop and is relatively inexpensive. It also has extensive driver support, so it works with Linux computers, Macs, and Windows PCs.

    The TP-Link Archer T4U is inexpensive, had excellent throughput performance all over our test home, didn’t drop connections while we were testing, has a two-year warranty, and works with Linux computers, Macs, and Windows PCs.

    Advertisement

    Budget pick

    TP-Link Archer T2U Plus

    The diminutive Archer T2U Plus has about half the Archer T4U’s performance at short range, but it’s a bit faster when farther away. It’s the best one to get if you want to spend $25 or less.

    The TP-Link Archer T2U Plus is a little bulkier than the Archer T4U, due to its 6-inch external antenna, and it didn’t perform as well. But it’s still very good and was the only sub-$25 adapter to complete all of our tests. It has an identical two-year warranty and is just as compatible with Macs and Windows or some Linux PCs.

    Upgrade pick

    Netgear Nighthawk A7000

    The Netgear Nighthawk A7000 costs significantly more than our other picks, but it’s the one you want for speedy file transfers and large downloads.

    The Netgear Nighthawk A7000 is a bulky USB adapter that costs almost three times as much as the budget Archer T2U Plus. However, the trade-off is worth it if your broadband connection is faster than 200 Mbps. It posted our top throughput scores all over our test home, significantly outperforming other Wi-Fi adapters.

    Everything we recommend

    Our pick

    TP-Link Archer T4U V3

    The Archer T4U has better performance than the internal Wi-Fi adapter built into our test laptop and is relatively inexpensive. It also has extensive driver support, so it works with Linux computers, Macs, and Windows PCs.

    Budget pick

    TP-Link Archer T2U Plus

    The diminutive Archer T2U Plus has about half the Archer T4U’s performance at short range, but it’s a bit faster when farther away. It’s the best one to get if you want to spend $25 or less.

    Upgrade pick

    Netgear Nighthawk A7000

    The Netgear Nighthawk A7000 costs significantly more than our other picks, but it’s the one you want for speedy file transfers and large downloads.

    The research

    • Why you should trust us
    • Who this is for
    • How we picked
    • How we tested
    • Our pick: TP-Link Archer T4U V3
    • Flaws but not dealbreakers
    • Budget pick: TP-Link Archer T2U Plus
    • Upgrade pick: Netgear Nighthawk A7000
    • What to look forward to
    • The competition
    • Sources

    Why you should trust us

    Before joining Wirecutter, Joel Santo Domingo tested and wrote about PCs, networking products, and personal tech at PCMag. com and PC Magazine for more than 17 years. Prior to writing for a living, Joel was an IT tech and system administrator for small, medium, and large companies.

    Testing wireless home networking has been a part of Joel’s life for the past 20-odd years through all versions of Wi-Fi, back to the wireless phone extension he tacked on the back of his Apple PowerBook. He did this so he could dial in to the Internet from his desk, his couch, and his bed (a rarity for the late 1990s).

    Who this is for

    If your PC came with built-in Wi-Fi, most folks will be happy without buying an external dongle; usually the computer will feel slow and become obsolete before the Wi-Fi radio does. But for desktop PCs without built-in Wi-Fi, a USB Wi-Fi adapter takes seconds to install and set up, no screwdrivers needed. It’s a lot easier than the alternatives—installing an internal Wi-Fi network card or running Ethernet cable through your home.

    For desktop PCs without built-in Wi-Fi, a USB Wi-Fi adapter takes seconds to install and set up, no screwdrivers needed.

    Though they’re mainly useful for desktops, USB Wi-Fi adapters are also a way to upgrade an older laptop to Wi-Fi or replace an internal card that’s no longer working without opening up your laptop. There are also limited cases when your laptop’s internal antennas are just awful. In those cases, an external Wi-Fi adapter can make a weak connection usable.

    How we picked

    Photo: Rozette Rago

    We looked for Wi-Fi 5 and Wi-Fi 6 (also known as 802.11ac and 802.11ax, respectively) USB Wi-Fi adapters from the major manufacturers, as well as others that appeared often in online searches and on shopping sites. We immediately disqualified 802.11n-only adapters, since that standard is over 10 years old.

    We chose each adapter using the following criteria:

    • Good throughput: Think of the tasks you do the most where you’re waiting and watching a spinning pinwheel. You need throughput to download updates and stream videos at the quality you’re paying for. We started by looking at each adapter’s AC rating: while those numbers are generally pretty misleading, they do tell you each adapter’s maximum theoretical throughput. For example, an AC1200 adapter is rated to provide 300 Mbps (megabits per second) on the 2.4 GHz band and 867 Mbps on the 5 GHz bands, but no adapter can achieve that. We tested each adapter to see how it could do in a real home.
    • Good range: A good Wi-Fi adapter should be able to maintain a strong connection and reasonably quick transfer speeds even when it’s several rooms away from your router.
    • Good price: This factor is very important—you shouldn’t have to pay more than $40 to $80 for a USB adapter. Paying more doesn’t necessarily mean better performance; the pricier adapters didn’t win all of our tests. If you’re paying more, you might as well consider upgrading your standalone router, running an Ethernet cable to the PC, or installing a new mesh network in your home.
    • Good compact case and sturdy build quality: Both will help you enjoy using your USB adapter. Smaller adapters won’t snag on cords or pop loose if inadvertently catch them on your arm, but they tend to have smaller antennas and weaker radios.
    • Beamforming and MU-MIMO: As the number of Wi-Fi devices grow, router and adapter manufacturers have to come up with ways to compensate for all those signals crossing through your living space. Beamforming aims the Wi-Fi signal to and from the router to your adapter, like how a spotlight is a more focused beam of light than the diffused illumination that comes off a naked light bulb. MU-MIMO (multiple user, multiple input/multiple output) lets the router and compatible devices communicate with each other simultaneously so devices don’t need to wait their turn to communicate with the router. Though they didn’t make a difference in our tests, these technologies will help you in the future as more devices adopt them, and they should ease network congestion in the long run.
    • A good warranty: All the adapters we tested had at least a one-year warranty, but two-year warranties are also common.
    • Multiple-OS support: All of the adapters we tested work with the latest version of Windows 10, but we noted when adapters claimed support for Linux, macOS, and earlier versions of Windows.
    • Ease of setup: Most if not all of these USB adapters should automatically use Windows 10 to install the correct driver and work. We noted if any extra steps were needed to get the adapter installed.

    We looked at reviews from trusted sources like PCMag, SmallNetBuilder, and Tom’s Hardware, but reviews for individual USB Wi-Fi adapters aren’t very common. We acquired over 20 adapters, including older and new models from Asus, D-Link, Edimax, Linksys, Netgear, Trendnet, and TP-Link.

    How we tested

    We plugged each USB adapter into the USB 3. 2 Gen 1 (aka USB 3.0) port of a Lenovo ThinkPad running Windows 10. We mostly relied on Windows Update to load an appropriate driver, since we found that the drivers it automatically installed were as new or newer than what was available from most manufacturers’ websites. If the driver wasn’t automatically loaded, we noted this and downloaded the driver from another source or online, as we had to do with the D-Link DWA-171 adapter. We ran all of our tests on its PCIe solid-state drive and USB 3.1 Gen 1 port, which were fast enough to avoid bottlenecking the adapters we tested.

    We connected a desktop PC via Ethernet to a TP-Link Archer AX50 Wi-Fi router as our file server, linked each Wi-Fi USB adapter to the router, and used our Netburn test to check each adapter’s ability to transfer data as fast as possible.

    The Archer AX50 was placed in the family room on the first floor of the 2,300 square-foot home, where the internet enters the house. We placed the Lenovo ThinkPad laptop at two testing points within the home. The close-range test location was within line of sight of the router, 7 feet away. The long-range testing location is in a basement corner bathroom on the other side of the home, about 75 feet away, with the underground foundation of the house on two sides of the room. The signal to the bathroom has to pass through the floor and several walls. We measured the throughput at both locations and used that data to determine our picks.

    Our pick: TP-Link Archer T4U V3

    Flaws but not dealbreakers

    The Archer T4U is a fairly bulky stick, measuring 3.64 by 1.24 by 0.55 inches (LWH), with an external antenna that swings up and out to 180 degrees relative to our test laptop’s keyboard. You can use the adapter with the antenna closed, but we tested it vertically at 90 degrees, like the other adapters with external antennas. It comes with a USB extension cradle, so you can place the adapter in a more convenient location.

    Budget pick: TP-Link Archer T2U Plus

    Upgrade pick: Netgear Nighthawk A7000

    Photo: Rozette Rago

    Upgrade pick

    Netgear Nighthawk A7000

    The Netgear Nighthawk A7000 costs significantly more than our other picks, but it’s the one you want for speedy file transfers and large downloads.

    If your daily routine includes multiple large file transfers, or if you’re paying for a broadband data plan with a 100 Mbps or higher limit, the Netgear Nighthawk A7000 is worth the upgrade. It has an AC1900 rating (600 Mbps on 2.4 GHz and 1,300 Mbps on 5 GHz), a bump up from the Archer T4U’s AC1300 rating. It costs roughly double the price of the Archer T4U, but it was the throughput winner across the board, beating all 5 USB Wi-Fi adapters as well as two new adapters rated for Wi-Fi 6.

    Make/model Speed at 8 feet, in Mbps Speed at long distance, in Mbps
    TP-Link Archer T4U 194 63
    TP-Link Archer T2U Plus 116 70
    Netgear Nighthawk AC1900 (A7000) 467 141
    Asus USB-AX56 184 84
    D-Link DWA-X1850 194 9

    On our Wi-Fi 6 tests, the A7000 was twice as fast or faster than the other adapters we tested, including the new Asus and D-Link Wi-Fi 6 adapters. At close range, the A7000 was able to transfer data at over double the rates of the Archer T4U, DWA-X1850, and Asus USB-AX56. At long range in the basement bathroom, the A7000 was the only adapter able to break the 100 Mbps barrier, while the T4U, USB-AX56, were significantly behind (with the DWA-X1850 achieving an abysmal 9 Mbps). If you need to move a lot of files locally to a NAS or between computers, if you’re a gamer waiting for updates, or if you’re downloading movies from the internet, the A7000 more than justifies its higher price tag.

    The Nighthawk A7000’s large size may make it an awkward fit for some computers; Netgear includes an extension cable and a stand so you can find a more convenient place for it on your desk. Photo: Rozette Rago

    The A7000 is significantly larger than the Archer T4U, measuring 4.7 by 1.8 by 0.87 inches (LWH), but it needs that chunky chassis for multiple radios, a swing-out antenna, and room for cooling vents. It supports beamforming and MU-MIMO, and it comes with an external USB cradle so you can reposition it on your desk. It only has a one-year warranty, and while that’s sufficient for most people, the TP-Link adapters do offer a two-year warranty for a lower price. The A7000 is Mac- and Windows–compatible. We did have to download the Windows driver from Asus’ website before testing, a small inconvenience.

    What to look forward to

    Routers supporting the 802.11ax protocol (also known as Wi-Fi 6) are becoming commonplace, along with internal 802.11ax adapters for laptops. We’ve tested the first two Wi-Fi 6 adapters (see below), but so far they’re not as fast as our Wi-Fi 5 upgrade pick.

    Adding to the potentially confusing situation, Wi-Fi 6e routers and mesh kits are starting to appear on networking websites. However, like all new networking technologies, it will take some time before Wi-Fi 6 and 6e hardware becomes common enough and cheap enough to make the upgrade worth it. You’ll need to have multiple Wi-Fi 6 or 6e devices (routers, laptops, phones, media streaming devices, and TVs) on your network to justify the expense of upgrading.We’ll be testing the new technology as it’s ready.

    The competition

    The D-Link DWA-X1850 was the first Wi-Fi 6 USB adapter to reach the market, and while it features newer technology, it performed poorly on our long-distance test with a Wi-Fi 6 router. It has an internal antenna, which may have contributed to its low performance. It is more expensive than our pick, only works with Windows 10, and has a short, one-year warranty. We’d recommend getting our pick or upgrade pick over the DWA-X1560.

    The Asus USB-AX56 was the second Wi-Fi 6 USB adapter released, and it is similar to the Asus USB-AC68 below. Its pop-out antennas helped it maintain a strong signal in the basement bedroom location, but the AX56 still lagged behind the Netgear A7000 at both testing locations. We also had to download the AX56’s Windows driver from the internet, a minor inconvenience. The AX56 includes a driver CD, but few laptops come with a drive that can read it. The USB-AX56 is about the same price as the A7000.

    Like the Nighthawk A7000, the Asus USB-AC68 is a large expensive stick with a pair of pop-out antennas. While its performance at the long distance testing point was adequate, the A7000 trounced the AC68’s throughput results, though the Asus adapter is about the same price.

    The D-Link DWA-192 tested well for PCMag and Tom’s Hardware, but those tests happened in the early days of 802.11ac and many newer adapters have come out since then. It performed well on our tests, but it is expensive, and its external ball-shaped housing isn’t as portable as our picks.

    The Netgear A6210 completed all of the tests within time limits, but it was the slowest adapter we tested that did so. The A6210’s price is double that of the T2U Plus, sealing its fate in last place.

    The D-Link DWA-171 completed three of the long-range transfer tests, but it took longer than 45 minutes to copy the music files folder in the bathroom. One oddity was that the DWA-171 didn’t automatically load Windows 10 drivers when plugged in. It has a built-in thumb drive with an installer for the drivers, which is a lot more inconvenient as we couldn’t use the adapter until we installed the driver manually. We checked Windows Update after getting online, and it loaded an up-to-date driver.

    The rest of the adapters we tested failed our long-range tests, whether they were mini/nano–sized (the type of USB adapter that sticks out less than an inch or so and can be left plugged into the laptop when you store it in a bag) or larger sticks with room for better antennas and radios. The mini/nano–sized adapters that took too long to complete the tests included the Asus USB-AC53 Nano, Edimax EW-7822UTC, Edimax EW-7822ULC, Linksys WUSB6100M, TP-Link Archer T2U, TP-Link Archer T2U Nano, TP-Link Archer T3U, and the Trendnet TEW-808UBM. The larger sticks that took too long were the Asus USB-AC56, Edimax EW-7833UAC, Linksys WUSB6400M, and the TP-Link Archer T9UH. The Trendnet TEW-809UB was the largest and most notable adapter to not pass the tests: it is a large external block with four external antennas, and at the time it costs more than the Nighthawk A7000.

    Sources

    1. Fixed Broadband Performance Report by Ookla, 2018 Speedtest US

    Meet your guide

    Joel Santo Domingo

    Joel Santo Domingo is a senior staff writer covering networking and storage at Wirecutter. Previously he tested and reviewed more than a thousand PCs and tech devices for PCMag and other sites over 17 years. Joel became attracted to service journalism after answering many “What’s good?” questions while working as an IT manager and technician.

    Further reading

    • Why We Love the TP-Link Archer A7 Wi-Fi Router

      by Joel Santo Domingo

      The TP-Link Archer A7 is the best Wi-Fi router for those on a budget. It offers superior performance at a reasonable price.

    • The Best Wi-Fi Hotspot

      by Rob Pegoraro

      If you find that you often need to get online when there’s no Wi-Fi around, you may need the speed and extra data allowance of a cellular Wi-Fi hotspot.

    • The Best USB Hubs

      by Nick Guy

      USB hubs offer the best way to add more functionality to a PC or notebook without many ports, and we have recommendations for almost every situation.

    • A Simple Solution to Bad Wi-Fi: Use Wires

      by Andrew Cunningham

      Using wires in your network can improve performance for your entire wireless network, not just the things that you connect wires to.

    Wirecutter is the product recommendation service from The New York Times. Our journalists combine independent research with (occasionally) over-the-top testing so you can make quick and confident buying decisions. Whether it’s finding great products or discovering helpful advice, we’ll help you get it right (the first time).

    • About Wirecutter
    • Our team
    • Staff demographics
    • Jobs at Wirecutter
    • Contact us
    • How to pitch
    • Deals
    • Lists
    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Make a Plan: Moving

    Dismiss

    How to choose a Wi-Fi adapter for a PC (desktop computer)

    If you have a regular desktop computer and the Internet is connected via a Wi-Fi router, then there are at least two ways that you can connect a PC to a router.

    Let’s look at both options:

    1. With network cable. In this case, there is one big minus, and one big plus. The downside is that you need to lay a network cable from the router to the computer. And if the router is installed near the PC, then this is not a problem. But it is not always possible to stretch the cable. It is not always convenient and beautiful. Well, the plus is that the cable connection is more stable, and the Internet speed will be higher.
    2. Via Wi-Fi network, using a special adapter. Desktop computers, as a rule, do not have built-in Wi-Fi adapters, and in order to connect a PC to a wireless network, this adapter needs to be purchased, installed and configured. This is not a problem, but an additional cost. But no wires. I wrote about this in the article: how to connect a regular computer (PC) to a Wi-Fi network.

    In this article, we will take a closer look at what Wi-Fi adapters for PC are, what to look for when choosing, and how to choose the right adapter for a desktop computer. It should be noted that the USB adapters discussed in this article can also be used on laptops without any problems. If the built-in module is broken, or does not work for some other reason.

    In the meantime, you choose a Wi-Fi adapter, you can use your Android mobile device instead. How to set it all up, I wrote in the article an Android phone as a Wi-Fi adapter for a computer.

    Perhaps you have another router, then you can try to configure it as a receiver according to this instruction.

    What are the Wi-Fi adapters? Deciding on the connection interface

    First of all, I advise you to decide on the interface through which the adapter will connect to a desktop computer. The most popular are USB and PCI Express. There is also PCMCIA (mainly for laptops), but they are no longer very relevant, therefore, we will not consider them. Let’s take a closer look at receivers that connect via USB and PCI.

    • Interface: USB . They are also called external. The most popular Wi-Fi adapters that look like a regular USB flash drive. They are different. Very small (like a receiver on a wireless mouse or keyboard), about the size of a USB flash drive, or more serious options that connect via a USB extension cable. Such receivers can be with or without antennas. They look like this:
      These receivers plug into your computer’s USB port. For better reception (to raise the adapter higher), you can connect it via a USB extension cable. Some models come with extension cords. They can be used on different computers and laptops. Disconnect and reconnect quickly. If you choose a receiver specifically for a regular computer, and not a laptop, then it is better to take a model with an antenna, or one that connects via an extension cable. For better Wi-Fi reception. The miniature model (the first one in the picture above) is best suited for laptops.
    • Interface: PCI Express . These are internal receivers. They look like a regular network card and plug into a PCI Express port on your computer’s motherboard.
      To install this adapter, your computer must have a free PCI Express slot (PCI Express x1). You will also need to hide the system unit. Well, as you understand, it will not work to quickly disconnect and connect such a receiver to another PC. Just like picking it up on an extension cord for better reception. Although they should not have problems with reception, all models have good antennas to amplify it. Of the pluses: it does not take up a USB port and does not stick out of the system unit (only antennas). Which, by the way, can be replaced with more powerful or remote ones.
    • M.2 interface. This is the newest and most modern way to connect Wi-Fi+Bluetooth module to PC motherboard. Almost all modern boards are equipped with multiple M.2 connectors. The presence of this interface on your motherboard does not mean that you can connect a wireless module to it. You need an M.2 Key A, or Key E connector. This information is always listed in the motherboard specifications. The connector itself may be labeled M.2 WiFi.
      But there is one caveat. Since these Wi-Fi modules are mainly intended for installation in laptops (where the wiring for connecting the built-in antennas on the laptop is already out), the module can work on the M. 2 Wi-Fi PC, but not see the Wi-Fi network. All because of the lack of antennas. Antennas are rarely included. But they can be bought and connected to the board separately. They look something like this:0026

    I think you have decided on the connection interface. As for other characteristics, there are no differences between USB and PCI. The information below applies to Wi-Fi adapters with different interfaces.

    Wi-Fi receiver selection according to specifications

    After you have decided on the connection interface, you need to look at other specifications. Basically, this is one indicator: the data transfer rate over a wireless Wi-Fi network. This determines the speed of the Internet connection that you will receive on your computer when connected via a Wi-Fi receiver.

    Also pay attention to the gain of the Wi-Fi network. I looked at different adapters, in the characteristics, as a rule, they do not indicate the power of the antennas. If your computer is installed far from the router, where the signal is not very stable, then for good Wi-Fi signal reception, take a receiver with external antennas. The system unit is usually installed on the floor. Therefore, for better reception, the adapter can be connected via a USB extension cable (if you have an external model) and placed on the table.

    Wi-Fi standard, support 802.11ac (5 GHz)

    At the time of this writing (late March 2017), there are the most 802.11n adapters on the market. Wireless network speed up to 300 Mbps (may be higher). The cheapest Wi-Fi adapters provide speeds up to 150 Mbps. I would advise buying such adapters only when you need to save a lot. It is better, of course, to buy a receiver with speeds up to 300 Mbps, and even better with support for the modern 802.11ac standard.

    If you have a dual-band router installed, or you are planning to purchase such a router to switch to the new 802.11ac standard, then of course immediately buy an adapter with 802.11ac support, and the ability to connect to Wi-Fi networks at a frequency of 5 GHz. This is very relevant in 2017. So that after replacing your router with a more modern one, you do not have to buy a new receiver with 802. 11ac support.

    Now I will explain. If you have (or already have) a modern router that supports the new 802.11ac standard, and an adapter that supports 802.11n, then you can connect to a Wi-Fi network, they are compatible. But the speed will be limited by the slower 802.11n standard. And you won’t see the full potential of an 802.11ac router, as the receiver will limit the speed.

    Compatible adapter, PC and router

    I have already been asked several times whether it is necessary to select a Wi-Fi adapter for a specific router and computer. Answer: no need. Everything will work. There are of course exceptions, usually associated with very old equipment. But I don’t think you will experience it.

    If your computer has a working USB port, then you can plug the adapter into it. Similarly with PCI Express. As for compatibility with the installed operating system, almost all adapters support operating systems from Windows XP to Windows 10. This means that the manufacturer has released drivers for these systems. This is always indicated in the specifications for a particular model. Also, almost all models support Mac OS.

    As for the compatibility of the adapter and the router, it’s just as hard to miss. Almost impossible. Since Wi-Fi standards are compatible with each other. And I doubt very much that you will find somewhere such an ancient router that the new receiver is incompatible with it. The adapter itself does not have to be from the same manufacturer as the router.

    Manufacturer, price, which model to choose?

    Almost every manufacturer that makes network equipment also produces Wi-Fi adapters. TP-Link, ASUS, D-Link, Netis, Tenda, Edimax, Belkin, Linksys, etc. The choice is very large. Which manufacturer to choose is up to you. I would advise focusing more not on the company, but on the technical characteristics (which suit you) and the price.

    As for the price, it starts at about $6. For this sum, we will get the simplest, smallest receiver with support for speeds up to 150 Mbps. I now have to introduce exactly models from popular manufacturers. Without Chinese devices. Again, be aware of your budget. If possible, of course, it is better to take a more expensive, modern and productive model.

    Popular adapters include: TP-LINK TL-WN725N, D-Link DWA-131, Tenda W311MA, Asus PCE-N15, Asus USB-N14, TP-LINK TL-WN727N, TP-LINK TL-WN722N, Tenda W311M and others . See online stores. Read reviews. The choice is actually very large. When you find a model that suits you, you can go and buy it in a regular store. Or order online.

    If you read my article with tips on choosing a Wi-Fi router, you probably noticed that I don’t really like to recommend specific models. Yes, and it makes no sense. Since everyone has different requirements and financial capabilities.

    How to connect and set up?

    I showed the setup process using the TP-Link Archer T4UH adapter as an example. Depending on the manufacturer and model, some points may differ. But as a rule, all actions are very similar.

    First you need to connect the adapter to your computer. To a USB port, or set it to PCI Express.

    Next, you need to install the driver and utility. The utility for managing the adapter itself can not be installed. Sometimes it is automatically installed along with the driver. If there was no driver disk in the kit, or you can’t install from a disk, then you can download it from the Internet. Only download from the official website of the manufacturer and strictly for your adapter model. Each manufacturer’s website has this option.

    After installing the drivers, you can connect your computer to a Wi-Fi network through the standard Windows menu, or using a proprietary utility. The process itself is no different from what I described in the article: how to connect a laptop (computer) to the Internet via Wi-Fi.

    By also connecting the Internet to the computer via a network cable, and installing a Wi-Fi adapter, you can not receive, but distribute Wi-Fi. How to do this, I wrote in the article: how to distribute the Internet through a Wi-Fi adapter on a PC.

    If your PC was previously connected to the Internet via cable, then after connecting via Wi-Fi, the connection speed may drop significantly. There is nothing wrong with this, and this does not mean that you did something wrong, or configured something incorrectly. True, it all depends on how much the speed has dropped. You can find tips for increasing the speed of your Wi-Fi connection in this article.

    In the comments, you can leave your question, or share useful information on this topic!

    how to connect and configure on a PC?

    Hello my dears! Today is a topic that will be of interest to everyone who is just starting to understand the wilds of wireless connections. More precisely, I will tell you how to make Wi-Fi on a stationary PC through a Wi-Fi adapter.

    Everyone in the house has a router. What is it for? Correctly, to connect home devices “over the air”, that is, without wires. In such a situation, a regular desktop computer is left out of business – it does not have a wireless module, and you have to use a cable Internet connection.

    A network device will help solve such a small but significant problem. How to set up and connect a USB and PCI Wi-Fi adapter, I will describe below.

    The theme is simple, even for beginners. But in any case, comments and online chat are always open for our readers, where my cheerful and friendly colleagues will answer any question!

    Contents

    1. Introduction
    2. Built-in modules
    3. External module
    4. PCI adapter
    5. Ask the author of the article